Sections:

Article

Washington Pre-Occupied... 'Here, as elsewhere, the people are rising.'

[The following originally appeared on Robert Reich's blog on November 3, 2011. You can read more at: http://robertreich.org/post/12303771388. A number of other blogs and Web sites are providing more and more information about the economy to readers. A recent book, Confidence Men, is being studied by the Substance staff in order for us to better understand the Obama White House and how it became Wall Street's courtesan.].

The three men who kept federal policy in the hands of the "one percent" for the benefit of Wall Street millionaires, billionaires, financial "engineers," and bankers. Left to right, U.S. Treasury Secretary Tomothy Geithner, President Barack Obama, and Economic Advisor Chairman Lawrence Summers.The biggest question in America these days is how to revive the economy.

The biggest question among activists now occupying Wall Street and dozens of other cities is how to strike back against the nation's almost unprecedented concentration of income, wealth, and political power in the top 1 percent.

The two questions are related. With so much income and wealth concentrated at the top, the vast middle class no longer has the purchasing power to buy what the economy is capable of producing. (People could pretend otherwise as long as they could treat their homes as ATMs, but those days are now gone.) The result is prolonged stagnation and high unemployment as far as

the eye can see.

Until we reverse the trend toward inequality, the economy can't be revived.

But the biggest question in our nation's capital right now has nothing to do with any of this. It's whether Congress's so-called "Supercommittee" — six Democrats and six Republicans charged with coming up with $1.2 trillion in budget savings — will reach agreement in time for the Congressional Budget Office to score its proposal, which must then be approved by Congress

before Christmas recess in order to avoid an automatic $1.5 trillion in budget savings requiring major across- the-board cuts starting in 2013.

Have your eyes already glazed over?

Diffident Democrats on the Supercommittee have already signaled a willingness to cut Medicare, Social Security, and much else that Americans depend on. The deal is being held up by Regressive Republicans who won't raise taxes on the rich — not even a tiny bit.

President Obama, meanwhile, is out on the stump trying to sell his "jobs bill" - which would, by the White House's own estimate, create fewer than 2 million jobs. Yet 14 million people are out of work, and another 10 million are working part-time who'd rather have full- time jobs.

Republicans have already voted down his jobs bill anyway.

The disconnect between Washington and the rest of the nation hasn't been this wide since the late 1960s.

The two worlds are on a collision course: Americans who are losing their jobs or their pay and can't pay their bills are growing increasingly desperate. Washington insiders, deficit hawks, regressive Republicans, diffident Democrats, well-coiffed lobbyists, and the lobbyists' wealthy patrons on Wall Street and in corporate suites haven't a clue or couldn't care less.

I can't tell you when the collision will occur but I'd guess 2012.

Look elsewhere around the world and you see a similar collision unfolding. The details differ but the larger forces are similar. You see it in Spain, Greece, and Italy, whose citizens are being squeezed by bankers insisting on austerity. You see it in Chile and Israel, whose young people are in revolt. In the Middle East, whose "Arab spring" is becoming a complex Arab fall and winter. Even in China, whose young and hourly workers are demanding more — and whose surge toward inequality in recent years has been as breathtaking as is its surge toward modern capitalism.

Will 2012 go down in history like other years that shook the foundations of the world's political economy — 1968 and 1989?

I spent part of yesterday in Oakland, California. The Occupier movement is still in its infancy in the United States, but it cannot be stopped. Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game - an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards.

Here, as elsewhere, the people are rising.



Comments:

November 7, 2011 at 1:43 AM

By: Jay Rehak

The Wealthy have a Stranglehold on the government

The problem is simply this: money rules the political process in this country. The money used to promote politicians most largely comes from wealthy individuals and large corporate interests. Consequently, the people who are elected and want to remain in office cowtow to the wealthiest contributors. Unless and until we can delink the money from the political process, the wealthy will continue to have a stranglehold on any economic recovery. The truth is: the wealthy need to pay more in taxes to sustain essential government services and yes, provide jobs for the larger community. Otherwise, there will continue to be civil unrest. I am afraid Mr. Reich may be right. 2012 could be an historic year.

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

1 + 4 =