Sections:

Article

LETTER: Testing companies donated big bucks to Florida senator who pushed major testing legislation until Governor's veto

Below is the story, how the president of the Florida Senate got money from testing companies (directly or indirectly) for his lobbying firm was the last straw for me. It made me crazy enough to consider running against him. He lives in my Senate district. I think I will form an exploratory committee sometime this week. I hope Gerald Bracey and my late husband are looking down on me and smiling. (Billee Bussard, Jacksonville, Florida).

Testing companies paid Thrasher's former lobbying firm... He and the companies claim no connection between him and bill. http://jacksonville. com/news/metro/2010-04-19/story/testing- companies-paid-thrashers- former-lobbying-firm Posted: April 19, 2010 - 12:03am

By Matt Dixon

Two out-of-state companies that offer education testing paid a lobbying firm where state Sen. John Thrasher was a partner between $60,000 and $190,000 over a two-year period, state records indicate.

During the current legislative session, Thrasher, a St. Augustine Republican, sponsored Senate Bill 6, which, among other things, would have required school districts to develop or acquire end-of-course assessment tests.

After drawing stiff criticism from educators and teachers' unions, the bill was vetoed Thursday by Gov. Charlie Crist.

Thrasher left the lobbying firm, Southern Strategy, in 2009 and has denied personally lobbying on behalf of the testing companies.

"I never had any connection to [the testing companies]," he said. "I was bought out last May and don't even have any connection with them anymore."

The companies - Ohio-based IQ Innovations and New Jersey-based Educational Testing Service - say the lobbying Southern Strategy did on their behalf was unrelated to Thrasher's bill.

IQ Innovations paid between $60,000 and $150,000 to Southern Strategy in 2008 and 2009, and Educational Testing Service paid the firm between $4 and $40,000 over the same period, according to state compensation reports. Lobbying firms are only required to report a range of payments received from clients.

The companies are still clients of Southern Strategy, but 2010 compensation reports are not yet filed with the state.

Southern Strategy founder Paul Bradshaw declined comment, saying it's company policy to not speak to the media about clients.

In 2009, Thrasher reported more than $1.5 million in income from Southern Strategy. Included in that amount is a $695,169 buyout, $614,613 in stock sales and $190,509 in salary, according to financial disclosure reports.

Lobbyists for Southern Strategy gave more than $7,200 to Thrasher's campaign when he ran for his Senate seat in 2009. 

BELOW IS THE TAMPA TRIBUNE ARTICLE OF APRIL 15, 2010, REPORTING ON GOVERNOR CRIST'S VETO.

CRIST VETOES EDUCATION BILL Tampa Tribune -- April 15, 2010 By Catherine Whittenburg http://www2.tbo.com/content/2010/apr/15/crist-vetoes-teacher-tenure-bill/

Tallahassee — Gov. Charlie Crist has just vetoed SB 6, ending a week of suspense and protests against the controversial teacher tenure bill sponsored by the chairman of Crist's own political party.

Crist's action goes against conservative leaders, including former Gov. Jeb Bush, and will likely spur more speculation that he plans to break from the party and run as an independent for U.S. Senate.

Crist has been in the hot seat since the House approved the bill in the early morning hours of April 9, after eight hours of debate. The measure passed both the House and Senate along party lines, but not without Republican defectors including Paula Dockery and Alex Villalobos in the Senate and Ed Homan and Faye Culp in the House, all of whom later urged Crist in writing to veto.

Because the governor received the bill during the session, he had only seven days to decide whether to sign or reject the measure. Crist's action today beat that clock by more than 24 hours.

Conservatives and business groups rallied around SB 6, arguing that it would be a transformational education reform, injecting unpredecented accountability into the public school system.

The bill would have ended traditional tenure for teachers hired after July 1 and tie teacher salaries and recertification directly to student performances on tests. The new emphasis on "performance pay," according to advocates like the Florida Chamber of Commerce, would reward the best teachers with more money, sooner in their careers.

It would have also made it easier for districts to freeze pay and even fire experienced teachers deemed to be ineffective. Critics argued the bill was a thinly veiled attack on the state teacher's union, historically a backer of the Democratic Party; SB 6 supporters countered that the union had led a fear-mongering campaign that misrepresented the bill.

Hillsborough County would have been exempt from this because of ongoing reform efforts at the local level. State and local teacher's unions mounted a massive protest campaign against the bill that surged in intensity after the final House vote.

Teachers, students and other opponents flooded the governor's office with tens of thousands of messages lambasting the bill for overemphasizing testing, robbing teachers of job security and ceding local districts' control over schools to the state. The bill, they said, included costly unfunded mandates and would become a disincentive for talented people to enter or stay in the teaching profession.

Senate sponsor John Thrasher, R-Jacksonville, who took over as chairman of the Republican Party of Florida in February, said repeatedly over the last week that Crist had assured him he would sign the bill. Crist acknowledged that he was supportive of the bill through much of the session but denied promising that he would actually sign it.



Comments:

April 22, 2010 at 9:39 AM

By: Jay Rehak

Teachers need to Boycott any State that Destroys tenure to its teachers

As teacher bashing continues in various state legislatures around the country, I agree with educators from around the country who say it's time for teachers nationwide to respond with their collective economic power. IF a state legislature, such as the one in Florida, votes to destroy teacher tenure in that state, the rest of the nation's teachers need to BOYCOTT that state. Specifically, if Florida resurrects its ill conceived teacher bashing measure, and proposes destroying teacher tenure, all teachers from around the country need to avoid spending time and money in Florida. (There are other states that have warm weather.) The legislators of Florida or any other state must understand that teacher bashing at the State level has implications at the national level. Should Florida legislators or any other state legislature continue to bash teachers and destroy public education, then educators from around the country must band together and respond with an economic boycott of that state.

It is time for educators from around the country to UNITE and fight these foolish, ill conceived efforts by the Florida legislature and others who would destroy tenure and public education. (The AFT and the NEA need to support and promote such boycotts.)

Similarly I agree with those who believe the teachers of Chicago need to begin an economic boycott of any newspaper or media outlet that promotes an anti-teacher agenda. Specifically, it's time for teachers from Chicago and around the state to stop buying the Chicago Tribune until it stops bashing teachers. Enough is enough. We certainly can't stop a newspaper from having an anti-teacher agenda, but we can collectively avoid supporting such a newspaper with our money.

Spread the word. Boycott.

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

1 + 3 =