Sections:

Article

Candlelight vigil, other protests planned at Guggenheim Elementary School on the evening of February 3, 2010

One of the most organized groups in opposition to Chicago's policy of school closings will re-assemble on the night of February 3, 2010, for the "community hearing"on the proposed closing of Guggenheim Elementary School. The hearing will take place at Guggenheim, 71st and Morgan, beginning at 5:30 p.m.

Bettye Plair (above, at podium) testifies in opposition to the proposed closing of Guggenheim Elementary School at the Board of Education hearing on January 28, 2010. Substance photo by George N. Schmidt.In addition to the coverage at substancenews.net, other reporters are beginning to cover the story. Most notably so far is Linda Lutton of WBEZ radio, whose story is now available for listening at:

http://www.wbez.org/Content.aspx?audioID=39606

CORE will be holding a candlelight vigil outside Guggenheim following the hearing. Other groups are also expected to participate to show support for Guggenheim.

TEXT OF THE WBEZ BROADCAST BELOW HERE:

School closures are becoming increasingly common in troubled urban school districts across the country. District officials believe closing and revamping failing schools might be the best way to fix them. Chicago Public Schools tomorrow begins a round of public hearings on its most recent plans to revamp or close 14 more public schools. But many parents—from New York to Chicago—are fighting fiercely to keep open their children's failing schools. WBEZ visited Chicago's Guggenheim Elementary, one school on the closure list, to find out why.

PHONE CALL: James? May I speak to Ms. Wilson?

Since finding out last week that her children’s school is slated to close, Betty Plair has spent a lot of time on the phone.

PHONE CALL: I want to make sure she’s coming to go down on the 28th to the public hearing about Guggenheim closing. We’re gonna get a bus together …I’m just letting her know, we’re gonna send out flyers so she can come. Tell her I’ll see her there. Guggenheim Elementary, in the south-side Englewood community, is where Plair’s children learned their ABCs and made their first friends. She’s watched six of them graduate in the gymnasium.

PLAIR: We’re gonna fight. We’re going to fight all the way. We’re going down there, when they have the meeting here we’re gonna be here fighting as well. I think anybody would fight for where they live and what they want.

What these parents are fighting for is a school the district considers one of the worst in the system. It’s in the bottom 5 percent of all elementary schools, CPS says. But many Guggenheim parents see a completely different place than the administrators downtown.

PARENTS: They never been here. They haven’t been here! When they come here then they should judge Guggenheim. Come here and sit in the class. Watch. Not about what another person says, or what’s on a sheet of paper.

Parents here see their kids advancing even though the district is telling them they’re not—at least not enough.

HOOKER: Ohio State, Illinois State, Wright State University, Western Illinois…

Rosetta Hooker rattles off the colleges her daughter’s been accepted to. She and three sisters were all educated at Guggenheim—so was their dad, who moved back to the neighborhood in part for the school.

ALTON HOOKER: And they’re all doing great, a 4.4 GPA, all honors classes—they’re doing great. So I was very shocked that they was trying to close Guggenheim.

Parents see Guggenheim as a vital part of their community. For Betty Plair it feels like family. She remembers how the school came together after a kindergartner was hit and killed by a car, and the time her own family’s home burned to the ground, and a Guggenheim teacher opened her doors.

KNOWLES: This is deeper than bad data on standardized test scores.

Timothy Knowles is director of the University of Chicago’s Urban Education Institute.

KNOWLES: This is about an institution being taken away that my child goes to, I went to, maybe my mother went to. Frankly, it’s about communities, it’s about neighborhoods, it’s about relationships. Data doesn’t tip those things.

And the district doesn’t factor those things in to its school closings. Most of Chicago’s closings and turnarounds have taken place in neighborhoods ravaged by poverty. Knowles says it’s hard to measure the cost of eliminating one of the last remaining institutions in a disinvested neighborhood. If we could measure that, it might make closing schools more of a dilemma.

CPS is convinced it’s doing the right thing by moving Guggenheim kids to better performing schools, including some magnet schools. Tosheda Boyd doesn’t agree.

BOYD: That’s their opinion. But in my opinion, I have four kids… my son just graduated from this school with a 99 percentile in math and reading. So, this is a very good school for my kids.

There’s an irony here for parents. While local and national education leaders talk about increasing school choice, parents like Phyllis Killins feel the choice they’ve made is being taken away.

KILLINS: My kids could go to a magnet school—they could have been in one. But I chose for them to be in Guggenheim.

In surveys, most Americans say they’re happy with their own child’s school. It’s when they’re asked about public education in general that they cite problems.

CPS is convinced that once parents see how much better their new schools are, they’ll come around.

BOYD: I don’t think that’s gonna be my case….

EDITOR'S NOTE ON REPUBLICATION USE. This is copyrighted content, news and analysis prepared and published by the staff and supporters of Substance (the print monthly) and Substance News Service (www.substancenews.net). Both are publications of Substance, Inc. Chicago, Illinois. The final edited version of this article and the accompanying graphics were posted at www.substance news.net February 7, 2010, 6:00 a.m. CDT. If you choose to reproduce this article in whole or in part, or any of the graphical material included with it, please give full credit to SubstanceNews as follows: Copyright © 2010 Substance, Inc., www.substancenews.net. Please provide Substance with a copy of any reproductions of this material and we will let you know our terms. Alternatively, please make a donation or take out a subscription to the print edition of Substance (see red button to the right). We are asking all of our readers to either subscribe to the print edition of Substance (a bargain at $16 per year) or make a donation. Both options are available on the right side of our Home Page. For further information, feel free to call us at our office at 773-725-7502. Collegial groups and teachers using this material for class use should simply inform us of the extent of your usage. Anyone utilizing this material for commercial purposes is in violation of U.S. and other international copyright laws. Copyright 2010 Substance, Inc. all rights reserved.



Comments:

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

2 + 3 =