Sections:

Article

Arne Duncan's corrupt legacy in promoting charter schools... '... the massive promotion of charter schools took place during Duncans watch... Even more perplexing is that the largest grant of $71 million ($32.5 million the first year) is going to Ohio...'

President Barack Obama's administration has been corrupt in many ways, but few have been as endlessly corrupt as Obama's promotion of charter schools and his attacks on the nation's real public schools. Above, Obama thanks Education Secretary Arne Ducnan (left) upon Duncan's resignation while incoming "acting secretary" of education John King stands between them. King will not be examined by Congress as he takes over the Education Department, since Obama does not want to have hearing held on King's qualifications and history. King was the leader of a corrupt charter school, then head of New York's schools, always promoting charter schools, privatization, Common Core, and all of the other attacks on democracy and public schools that have characterized the Obama administration's policies since January 2009.[Editor's Note: The following article was forwarded to us by a Chicago colleague. It originally appeared on "Our Future" and is reprinted here. There needs to be a continued examination of the Obama administration's attacks on democracy and the nation's public schools. http://ourfuture.org/20151008/the-ugly-charter-school-scandal-arne-duncan-is-leaving-behind. George N. Schmidt, Editor, Substance].

The Ugly Charter School Scandal Arne Duncan Is Leaving Behind, OCTOBER 8, 2015 Jeff Bryant

Arne Duncans surprise announcement to leave his post as secretary of education in December is making headlines and driving lots of commentary, but an important story lost in the media clutter happened three days before he gave notice.

On that day, Duncan rattled the education policy world with news of a controversial grant of $249 million ($157 million the first year) to the charter school industry. This announcement was controversial because, as The Washington Post reports, an audit by his departments own inspector general found that the agency has done a poor job of overseeing federal dollars sent to charter schools.

Post reporter Lynsey Layton notes, The agencys inspector general issued a scathing report in 2012 that found deficiencies in how the department handled federal grants to charter schools between 2008 and 2011 in other words, during Duncans watch.

Even more perplexing is that the largest grant of $71 million ($32.5 million the first year) is going to Ohio, the state that has the worst reputation for allowing low-performing charter schools to divert tax money away from educational purposes and do little to raise the achievement of students.

A number of Ohio officials were shocked by the news.

As a different article from The Post reports, Democratic Party Rep. Tim Ryan was alarmed by the Education Departments decision. Ryan called his states charter school sector broken and dysfunctional.

Ted Strickland, an ex-governor and now Democratic candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in Ohio, wrote Duncan a letter telling him to reconsider the Ohio grant. Too many of Ohios charter schools are an embarrassment, he states. Strickland quotes from a recent study showing charters in his state perform significantly worse than public schools. He points to a recentscandal in which the person in the states department of education responsible for oversight of charters had to resign because he was caught rigging the books.

Even Ohio Republicans are disturbed about Secretary Duncans generosity to charter schools in the Buckeye State. Like a parent who sees a visiting relative doling out chocolate bars to an already stimulated child, State Auditor Dave Yost quickly stated his concerns about the new charter school largesse to the media and his intention to track how the money is spent. Yost should know. An audit he conducted earlier this year found that charter schools in the state misspend millions of tax dollars.

Why is the Department rewarding this unacceptable behavior? Strickland asked in his letter.

Money For What?

Certainly throwing unaccounted for federal tax money at charter schools is nothing new.

A recent report from the Center for Media and Democracy found that over the past 20 years the federal government has sent over $3.3 billion to the charter school industry with virtually no accountability. That report notes the federal government maintains no comprehensive list of the charter schools that have received and spent these funds or even a full list of the private or quasi-public entities that have been approved by states to authorize charters that receive federal funds.

But Secretary Duncan has been particularly generous to charter schools. One of the conditions states had to meet to win a Race to the Top grant, his signature program, was to raise any caps they may have had on the number of charter schools allowed to operate in the state. His department warned states receiving waivers to the onerous provisions of No Child Left Behind not to enact any new policies that would undermine charter schools autonomy.

Congress has done its part, too, raising the amount of federal money going to charter schools through the Charter School Grants program.

The CMD report cited above calculated that the feds are expected to increase charter school funding by 48 percent in fiscal year 2016, which would have been Duncans last year on the job. Thats about $375 million more for charters, estimates journalist Juan Gonzalez.

Yet at the same time federal support for charter schools continues to grow, revelations increasingly show the results of that spending are frequently disastrous.

Dollars For Disaster

A recent report from the Center for Popular Democracy and the Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools (AROS) uncovered over $200 million in alleged and confirmed financial fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement committed by charter schools around the country.

The report follows a similar report released a year ago by the same groups that detailed $136 million in fraud and waste and mismanagement in 15 of the 42 states that operate charter schools. The 2015 report cites $203 million, including the 2014 total plus $23 million in new cases, and $44 million in earlier cases not included in the previous years report.

Authors of the report called $200-plus million the tip of the iceberg, because much of the fraud will go undetected because the federal government, the states, and local charter authorizers lack the oversight necessary to detect the fraud.

Adding to concerns over how federal funds for charter schools are used, state audits, like the one conducted in Ohio, have also found widespread financial fraud and abuse committed by these schools.

Although the CPD-AROS report made policy recommendations for mandatory audits of charters and increased transparency and accountability for these schools, none of those recommendations seem to have gotten any attention, much less action, from Duncan and his staff.

A Process Cloaked In Mystery

Both the ends and the means of federal grants to charter schools remain mostly a mystery. Not only do we not know what happens to most of the money; we dont know how recipients for the money are chosen.

As CMDs Jonas Persson writes on that organizations PR Watch blog, The public is being kept in the dark about which states have applied for the lucrative grants, and what their actual track records are when it comes to preventing fraud and misuse The U.S Department of Education has repeatedly refused to honor a CMD request under the Freedom of Information Act for the grant applications, even though public information about which states have applied would not chill deliberation and might even help better assess which applicants should receive federal money.

Also unknown are the names of the peers who review applications for the grant money.

How Ohio became chosen for more charter school money is especially enigmatic, not only because of the bad reputation of the states charter schools, but also because of the circumstances of how the states application was pitched to Duncan and his staff.

Soon after the announcement of the grant, the Akron Beacon reported a Ohio Department of Education official who helped obtain the $71 million in federal money was the very same official who resigned in July after manipulating data to boost charter schools. The official resigned a mere two days after filing the grant application.

Whats also interesting about the new federal grant money for Ohio charters is its timing.

Was Money Timed For Youngstown Takeover?

As the Beacon report notes, The additional federal dollars come as the Ohio Department of Education decides how to distribute $25 million set aside by state lawmakers to help charter schools pay rent, purchase property, or renovate buildings. The money is yet one more assist to charter-school proponents in need of a building. Rent and building acquisition are two of the biggest deterrents to start-ups.

The grant to Ohio also seems especially well timed to the targeted takeover of one of the most troubled school districts in the state, Youngstown.

As a recent report in Belt Magazine explains, The Youngstown City Schools, which could lay claim to the title of the worst school district in the state had been under academic distress for the past five years. Enrollment had dropped 21 percent since 2010.

This summer, a House education bill with bipartisan support was about to sail through the legislature when State Senator Peggy Lehner, the chairwoman of the Senate Education Committee, suddenly introduced an amendment.

The amendment, Belt reporter Vince Guerrieri recounts, informally dubbed the Youngstown Plan, allows for the dissolution of the academic distress commission of any district thats gotten an F grade for three years in a row or has been under academic distress for at least four years. Youngstown is the only school district that meets that qualification.

Within 12 hours of the introduction of the amendment, it had passed the legislature, Guerrieri writes.

The fast-tracked legislation sets up, according to an NPR outlet in the state, a five member Academic Distress Commission with a three member majority chosen by the state school superintendent. That group then appoints a CEO with extraordinary powers. He could not only change the collective bargaining agreement with teachers but also create or contract with charter schools.

State school board member Patricia Bruns a Democrat says bypassing local elected officials including the school board is unconstitutional. Their idea is to take over the schools, dismantle whats there, and dole them out to private, for-profit charters.

So was the federal grant to Ohio timed to pay for the take over of Youngstown schools?

Thats the question Ohio edu-blogger and public school advocate Jan Resseger wants answered. She points to an article by Akron Beacon education reporter Doug Livingston who alleges the new funding for charter schools in Ohio is designed specifically to pay for the fast-tracked state takeover of the Youngstown schools. Livingston backs up his claim with a quote from Arne Duncans press secretary Elaine Quesinberry who confirmed, that the Ohio education officials filled out the grant application with the intent to direct money to charter school startups in academic distressed areas. Only two, Youngstown and Lorain, currently fit that description.

What Reform?

Meanwhile, as the House bill containing the Youngstown Plan passed with extraordinary haste, another bill to make charter schools more transparent and accountable remained mired in contentious through the summer recess. That bill now seems likely to get approved by the legislature, based on reports received at press time. But theres no clear magic bullet in the bill, according to a Cleveland news outlet, at least in terms of reforming charter schools in the state.

The bill makes several small changes, the reporter contends. Private and for-profit charter school operators will have to provide more information to the public about how they spend tax dollars they are paid to run the schools. But the books wont be anywhere near as open as a public school districts.

Also, what amounts to accountability for charters seems especially weak under the provisions of the new law. The Ohio Department of Education will start to publicize which operators run each school and give information to the public about the academic performance of the schools that each operator runs. That will let families know the track record of the people running a school. It will? How many families will dig into state reports to make decisions about where to send their kids to school?

A Hands-Off Policy For Charter Schools?

For his part, Secretary Duncan seems little interested in how new federal grants to charter schools will be spent, saying its largely up to states and the public agencies that approve charter schools, according to the Post article cited above. At the federal level, we dont have a whole lot of leverage, he mused.

This seems an oddly resigned comment from an education secretary whose department has made the minute scrutiny of state policy governing nearly everything having to do with public education from standards, to teacher evaluations, to tutoring requirements.

Why would a secretary so often accused of leading an unprecedented overreach of federal intrusion in state education policy suddenly become so nonchalant about oversight of charter schools?

It certainly doesnt help dampen suspicion that Duncans replacement as acting secretary will be John King, the controversial former New York State Education Commissioner, who has deep ties to the charter school industry.

Before becoming New York Commissioner, King helped to found and operate a charterschool management organization with schools in New York, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.

Because King will be acting secretary, no nomination process or Congressional hearings will be needed to approve the leadership change.



Comments:

October 13, 2015 at 5:29 PM

By: Ken Derstine

Arne Duncan and The Broad Foundation

According to the 2009/1010 Broad Foundation Annual Report https://goo.gl/vh7Yn3 (page 25),

Arne Duncan was on the board of The Broad Foundation until he became Sec of Ed. On page 10 it says "Prior to becoming U.S. secretary of education, Arne Duncan was CEO of Chicago Public Schools, where he hosted 23 Broad Residents. Duncan now has five Broad Residents and alumni working with him in the U.S. Department of Education.

On page 5 if says "The election of President Barack Obama and his appointment of Arne Duncan, former CEO of Chicago Public Schools, as the U.S. secretary of education, marked the pinnacle of hope for our work in education reform. In many ways, we feel the stars have finally aligned.

With an agenda that echoes our decade of investmentscharter schools, performance pay for teachers, accountability, expanded learning time and national standardsthe Obama administration is poised to cultivate and bring to fruition the seeds we and other reformers have planted.

October 14, 2015 at 9:32 PM

By: Taylor Martin

Duncan

I remember how excited all of the teachers were when Obama got elected. Then they put Duncan in the Ed Office and the "Trickle Down" arrogant cruelty started to permeated the schools.

The joy of teaching was replaced with the fear of losing our vocations. He did more damage to teaching than Bush. And I was a huge Bush hater. But Duncan and Obama were the worst.

WITH Duncan as Sec of Education, Gov. Rauner , Rahm as our Mayor and his corrupt board, a revolving door of Education Charlatans, Area Officers and Principals that practically ask that you to genuflect, we have entered the perfect storm of Education "sucking". Had to use the word ..no other describes the atmosphere at CPS and teaching in general.

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

5 + 2 =