Sections:

Article

Mayor took more than $600,000 in campaign contributions from companies doing business with Chicago public pensions... Fioretti demands Rahm return campaign donations from pension investors

Continuing his energetic campaign for Mayor of Chicago, Second Ward Alderman Bob Fioretti on November 14, 2014 responded to recent press revelations about the corruption of the administration of Mayor Rahm Emanuel by demanding that the mayor return nearly a half million dollars in contributions to his campaign fund by those doing direct business with public pension funds. "A report in the International Business Times shows that Mayor Emanuel has taken more than $600,000 in campaign contributions from individuals and organizations that manage Chicago pension funds," one press statement from Fioretti said.

Second Ward alderman Bob Fioretti has escalated his campaign for Mayor of Chicago following the insult delivered to him by the organizers of the Chicago Teachers Union LEAD (Legislators Educators Appreciation Dinner) on October 31, 2014. Despite Fioretti's four years of support for the CTU on virtually every issue pertaining to the public schools, the LEAD dinner organizers ignored Fioretti's contributions to the union and at the last minute announced that Karen Lewis was endorsing Jesus "Chuy" Garcia for mayor. Fioretti, who had bought a table at the dinner, sat through the speeches and then left the dinner to continue his campaign for mayor. Substance photo by Sharon Schmidt. Now the incumbent mayor has two major financial scandals to confront.

The pension funds scandal, which originally broke in International Business Times, joins the scandal involving the Board of Education's bond debt. The Board of Education has been involved in utilizing interest rate swaps for debt. As of November 13, 2014, the Emanuel administration has now been caught (by International Business Times) illegally taking donations from companies and individuals doing business with public pensions. Emanuel has also been caught lying about the continuation of the "toxic swaps" (as the Chicago Teachers Union has called them) from the City of Chicago and the Chicago Board of Education. (The investigations into the swaps, which were begun by Substance, CORE and the Chicago Teachers Union, have recently blown up after a lengthy investigation by the Chicago Tribune newspaper).

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (November 14, 2014). Fioretti calls for Mayor to Return Money, SEC & Council Investigations

PAY TO PLAY?

November 13, 2014

Contact: Aaron Lorence. ALorence@BobFioretti.com | 708-307-9264

Chicago, IL A report in the International Business Times shows that Mayor Emanuel has taken more than $600,000 in campaign contributions from individuals and organizations that manage Chicago pension funds. These dealings are called pay-to-play and said to smell like bribery in the article, found here: http://www.ibtimes.com/chicago-mayor-rahm-emanuel-accepted-campaign-contributions-financial-firms-managing-1723396

Mr. Emanuel, who formerly worked in the finance industry, should know the rules and that these actions further erode any trust the public had in his ability to lead this city. Bob Fioretti calls for:

The SEC to investigate and review all of these dealings and see what rules or codes were broken, and make a recommendation to clean up these dirty dealings in Chicago.

Inspector General Ferguson to audit and to recommend changes to the local rules and ethics codes.

City Council should exercise oversight over these contributions. Mr. Emanuel should return all tainted campaign contributions in question and explain how he, a former finance industry executive, let this happen under his watch. This week we have seen back-to-back financial failures from Mr. Emanuel, and blatant violations of the public trust. He is profiting from pay-to-play with your childrens education funds and pensioners safety net, said Fioretti.

FIORETTI ALSO EMAILED HIS SUPPORTERS ABOUT THE SCANDAL

Friends: Another day, another disgrace for this administration. It is exhausting to keep up with the scandals since the debate should actually be about how we make our streets safe and neighborhoods strong. But here we are talking about the mayors pay to play and dancing on the line of right vs. wrong.

At one point, our mayor worked in the finance industry, so he should know the rules. Once again, the well connected get the benefits, and too many in this city get nothing. When the Mayor talked about transparency and accountability, we thought he was being serious. He and his allies in City Hall need to know our city is not for sale. The Mayor should return the money and the SEC and City Council should review all these dealings. We need to get to the bottom of this latest scandal . This Februarys election is about a choice, and today that choice became much more pronounced. More of the same? Or a new direction?

MEDIA STORY ON THE SCANDAL (FROM INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES)

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Accepted Campaign Contributions From Financial Firms Managing City Pension Money

http://www.ibtimes.com/chicago-mayor-rahm-emanuel-accepted-campaign-contributions-financial-firms-managing-1723396

By David Sirota@davidsirotad.sirota@ibtimes.com on November 13 2014 3:44 PM

Executives at investment firms that manage Chicago pension funds have since 2011 poured more than $600,000 in contributions into Mayor Rahm Emanuel's campaign operation and political action committees (PACs) that support him, according to documents reviewed by the International Business Times. These contributions appear to flout federal rules banning companies that manage pension funds from financing the campaigns of officials with authority over pension systems, say legal experts.

The contributions also potentially conflict with an executive order Emanuel himself signed in 2011 prohibiting city contractors and subcontractors from making campaign donations to city officials.

A former chief of staff to President Obama, Emanuel, a Democrat, was elected Chicago mayor three years ago with a substantial boost from financial services executives. Since 2011, at least 31 executives at firms that harvest fees by managing city pension funds have contributed to his campaign and associated PACs. That list of donors includes Kelly Welsh, a Northern Trust executive who was recently appointed by President Obama to the top legal position in the U.S. Commerce Department. (See related story here.)

Former prosecutors, corporate compliance attorneys and erstwhile officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission describe the donations as a clear breach of the spirit -- and perhaps the letter -- of the SEC's so-called pay-to-play rule, which seeks to prevent pension investments from being doled out as a form of patronage to those who contribute to campaigns.

"The management of municipal pensions should be totally transparent and free of political influence, former SEC chairman Arthur Levitt told the IBTimes after the Chicago contributions were described to him. The acceptance of contributions by city officials from advisers managing city funds, in my book, smells like bribery.

Emanuel did not respond to a request for comment.

Former prosecutors and SEC lawyers say the Chicago situation exemplifies a troubling national trend: Mayors and governors are taking office through, in part, the largesse of financial services companies that bankroll their campaigns, then using their newfound authority over pension systems to put public money into the hands of their donors.

It looks like these contributions to Rahm Emanuel violate the pay-to-play prohibitions, Melanie Sloan, a former federal prosecutor in the Clinton administration who now runs the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said. This is looking like a more significant problem throughout the country. Politicians are treating these rules as if they are meaningless and it is time for regulators to take action against all the violators. The SEC needs to step in and shut this down.

The contributions to Emanuel from financial firms that manage municipal pension funds -- the retirement savings for city teachers, police, firefighters and other municipal employees -- appear to conflict with the objectives of the SEC's pay-to-play rule, which the commission enacted three years ago after a major pension corruption scandal in New York.

"Elected officials who allow political contributions to play a role in the management of these assets and who use these assets to reward contributors violate the public trust," the agency declared in announcing the rule. "They undermine the fairness of the process by which public contracts are awarded...They can harm pension plans that may subsequently receive inferior advisory services and pay higher fees. Ultimately, these violations of trust can harm the millions of retirees that rely on the plan."

The rule specifically prohibits financial firms from earning fees from public pension funds if their executives make campaign donations to the public officials who can exert influence over pension investments.

Emanuel qualifies as such an official, legal experts told IBTimes, because he and his administration appoint trustees to the boards that manage the $23 billion in Chicago's six municipal pension funds.

The rule applies to contributions to officials like Emanuel both before and during the term of an investment, even if -- as in Chicagos case -- the original decision to invest in the firms was made before the public official took office. In its first enforcement action under the rule, in June, the agency explicitly said the rule applies even when there is no proof that campaign contributions were part of a "quid pro quo or actual intent to influence an elected official or candidate. The prosecution of that firstenforcement action involved contributions totaling just $4,500 -- far smaller than the amount of money that has flowed to Emanuel.

"The SEC could not be more clear: They don't care about intent or the actual ability to affect public activity -- it is purely a relationship-based penalty," Stefan Passantino, who runs the political law team at McKenna, Long & Aldridge LLP, said. "The entire reason these laws exist is because legislators can't always prove there is a direct linkage between the giving of money and the request for official favors as is the case with bribery, so they ban the conduct entirely."

The SECs chief of enforcement told a conference of financial executives this week that the commission is intensifying its scrutiny of the relationship between campaign contributions and public pension investments. In addition to the June enforcement action, SEC documents revealed this week that the agency is investigating the relationship between the public pension business of financial firm State Street and that firms political contributions and lobbying activities.

What the SEC rules mean, according to Jay Dubow, a former attorney in the SECs division of enforcement, is this: "You can either influence elections, or you can run funds that manage money for public entities. You cannot do both."

It appears that some companies did.

In Chicago, the John Buck Co. is currently listed as a real estate investment manager for two city pensionfunds. In all, the firm has managed $54 million of city pension money and has earned hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees from those funds since 2011. Executives of the company, which has various business interests before the city government, recently gave more than $47,000 to Emanuels campaign. A firm executive also gave $10,500 to a political action committee that the Chicago Tribune notes Emanuel uses for political activities that support his policy initiatives at City Hall.

The company declined IBTimes request for comment.

Madison Dearborn Partners, a private equity firm, manages Chicago pension money as one of a group of managers in a set of pooled investments. Company executives have contributed more than $52,000 to Emanuel's campaign since 2011. The firm's executives also gave more than $456,000 to two political action committees set up by Emanuel associates to support the mayor.

Though the SEC rule and Emanuel's executive order seem on their face clear and unambiguous, the contributions from Madison Dearborn executives highlight one legal ambiguity that companies managing pension money may be relying on to continue directing cash to campaigns: The firm argues that it is essentially exempt from the restrictions because Madison Dearborn does not directly manage Chicago pension money. Rather, it manages Chicago money that is invested in a pooled investment vehicle known as a fund of funds. Madison Dearborn is one of handful of companies in a pair of fund-of-funds that get Chicago pension cash.

Madison Dearborn Partners is in full compliance with all SEC rules and legislation, the company said in a written statement.

Public pension systems typically do not release the identities of a fund of funds managers -- sub-advisers, in the relevant legal parlance. They are usually known only by pension officials and the investment firms themselves. The public, meanwhile, can see only the identities of the firms running the entire fund of funds. But documents obtained by IBTimes reveal that one piece of the Chicago pension system, the $5.3 billion Municipal Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund, invests in an Adams Street Partners fund of funds in which Madison Dearborn entities comprise 9 of the 16 total funds.

In other words, Madison Dearborn manages a significant slice of Chicago pension investments.

The SEC has explicitly decreed that managers of a fund of funds are governed by its pay-to-play rules. "It is not appropriate to exclude subadvisers from the rule," the commision said, because otherwise the rule would be compromised by a gaping loophole: Firms that sought to avoid compliance with the rule's strictures could make campaign contributions as they pleased while handling their public pension business exclusively through fund of fund relationships. The agency included provisions barring financial firms from doing "indirectly what [they] could not do directly under the rule."

In an emailed statement, Adams Street CEO T. Bondurant French told IBTimes, "Madison Dearborn Partners is not a sub adviser to Adams Street Partners." When asked about the municipal documentshowing that 9 of the 16 funds in Adams Streets fund of funds are run by Madison Dearborn Partners, French did not respond.

Attorneys for the law firm Cohen and Milstein, which advises clients on SEC compliance, recently told retirement system trustees gathered at a conference in New Orleans that executives at companies managing public pension money through fund of funds are covered by the rule.

Madison Dearborn maintains it is not obligated under the rule to determine whether it is managing Chicago pension money. But former SEC attorney Dubow says that argument is not good enough.

"You can't just put your head in the sand and say I don't want to know, said Dubow, who is now a lawyer at the Pepper Hamilton law firm. The onus is going to be on the subadviser to show they didn't know they were managing pension money."

Asked about Mayor Emanuels ban on contributions from municipal subcontractors, Madison Dearborn said it is not a municipal subcontractor, and contended that the executive order does not apply to the citys pension system.

Chicago Alderman Scott Waguespack took issue with that interpretation.

The executive order should apply to the contractors and subcontractors across the board, including in the pension funds, he told IBTimes. That's one of the most lucrative areas where these guys can make money. They are given a large chunk of change to play with and there's little oversight of these financial contracts from any legislative body or organization. Firms doing business with Chicago pension funds are clearly contractors -- trying to say otherwise is splitting hairs to try to say these contributions are legal.

In the John Buck case, city documents show the firm directly manages city pension money -- and earns hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees -- through its own real estate equity funds. At the same time, its executives have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to Emanuels campaign.

John Buck and other real estate firms managing public pension money may be assuming they are not regulated by the SEC or any of the agencys rules.

SEC documents show that while an affiliate of the John Buck Co. had in 2008 been a registered SEC investment adviser, that registration has expired. If the company is not actually managing real estate securities, and is only buying and selling buildings, it may not have to register and therefore may not be subject to SEC rules, said former SEC counsel Scott Kimpel of Hunton & Williams law firm. But a close reading of SEC guidance suggests the rule is designed to cover all investment firms doing business with public pension systems.

David Hoffman, a former Chicago inspector general who served on the Illinois anti-corruption panel formed after the prosecution of Gov. Rod Blagojevich, told IBTimes that while the nuances of pay-to-play laws can be debated and parsed, their intent is obvious.

The purpose of these limitations on campaign contributions is to try to ensure that the city's decisions about who should manage its money are made on the merits, and without regard to any influence that could come from a campaign contribution, Hoffman, who is currently an Emanuel administrationappointee, said. It makes sense to understand the rules in light of that purpose -- and especially in light of the problematic history that we've seen in the state and city in that regard."

VERSION AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES WEBSITE ON THE MORNING OF NOVEMBER 14, 2014

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Accepted Campaign Contributions From Financial Firms Managing City Pension Money

By David Sirota@davidsirotad.sirota@ibtimes.com on November 13 2014 3:44 PM

Share on facebook

2.2k

Share on twitter

700

Share on linkedin

12

Share on google_plusone_share

More Sharing Services

17

Rahm Emanuel

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (center) looks over at one of the Chicago Police Department's newest recruits during a graduation ceremony on April 21, 2014. Reuters/Jim Young

Executives at investment firms that manage Chicago pension funds have since 2011 poured more than $600,000 in contributions into Mayor Rahm Emanuel's campaign operation and political action committees (PACs) that support him, according to documents reviewed by International Business Times. These contributions appear to flout federal rules banning companies that manage pension funds from financing the campaigns of officials with authority over pension systems, say legal experts.

The contributions also potentially conflict with an executive order Emanuel himself signed in 2011 prohibiting city contractors and subcontractors from making campaign donations to city officials.

A former chief of staff to President Obama, Emanuel, a Democrat, was elected Chicago mayor three years ago with a substantial boost from financial services executives. Since 2011, at least 31 executives at firms that harvest fees by managing city pension funds have contributed to his campaign and associated PACs. That list of donors includes Kelly Welsh, a Northern Trust executive who was recently appointed by President Obama to the top legal position in the U.S. Commerce Department. (See related story here.)

Former prosecutors, corporate compliance attorneys and erstwhile officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission describe the donations as a clear breach of the spirit -- and perhaps the letter -- of the SEC's so-called pay-to-play rule, which seeks to prevent pension investments from being doled out as a form of patronage to those who contribute to campaigns.

"The management of municipal pensions should be totally transparent and free of political influence, former SEC chairman Arthur Levitt told IBTimes after the Chicago contributions were described to him. The acceptance of contributions by city officials from advisers managing city funds, in my book, smells like bribery.

Emanuel did not respond to a request for comment.

Former prosecutors and SEC lawyers say the Chicago situation exemplifies a troubling national trend: Mayors and governors are taking office through, in part, the largesse of financial services companies that bankroll their campaigns, then using their newfound authority over pension systems to put public money into the hands of their donors.

It looks like these contributions to Rahm Emanuel violate the pay-to-play prohibitions, Melanie Sloan, a former federal prosecutor in the Clinton administration who now runs the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said. This is looking like a more significant problem throughout the country. Politicians are treating these rules as if they are meaningless and it is time for regulators to take action against all the violators. The SEC needs to step in and shut this down.

The contributions to Emanuel from financial firms that manage municipal pension funds -- the retirement savings for city teachers, police, firefighters and other municipal employees -- appear to conflict with the objectives of the SEC's pay-to-play rule, which the commission enacted three years ago after a major pension corruption scandal in New York.

"Elected officials who allow political contributions to play a role in the management of these assets and who use these assets to reward contributors violate the public trust," the agency declared in announcing the rule. "They undermine the fairness of the process by which public contracts are awarded... They can harm pension plans that may subsequently receive inferior advisory services and pay higher fees. Ultimately, these violations of trust can harm the millions of retirees that rely on the plan."

The rule specifically prohibits financial firms from earning fees from public pension funds if their executives make campaign donations to the public officials who can exert influence over pension investments.

Emanuel qualifies as such an official, legal experts told IBTimes, because he and his administration appoint trustees to the boards that manage the $23 billion in Chicago's six municipal pension funds.

The rule applies to contributions to officials like Emanuel both before and during the term of an investment, even if -- as in Chicagos case -- the original decision to invest in the firms was made before the public official took office. In its first enforcement action under the rule, in June, the agency explicitly said the rule applies even when there is no proof that campaign contributions were part of a "quid pro quo or actual intent to influence an elected official or candidate. The prosecution of that first enforcement action involved contributions totaling just $4,500 -- far smaller than the amount of money that has flowed to Emanuel.

"The SEC could not be more clear: They don't care about intent or the actual ability to affect public activity -- it is purely a relationship-based penalty," Stefan Passantino, who runs the political law team at McKenna, Long & Aldridge LLP, said. "The entire reason these laws exist is because legislators can't always prove there is a direct linkage between the giving of money and the request for official favors as is the case with bribery, so they ban the conduct entirely."

The SECs chief of enforcement told a conference of financial executives this week that the commission is intensifying its scrutiny of the relationship between campaign contributions and public pension investments. In addition to the June enforcement action, SEC documents revealed this week that the agency is investigating the relationship between the public pension business of financial firm State Street and that firms political contributions and lobbying activities.

What the SEC rules mean, according to Jay Dubow, a former attorney in the SECs division of enforcement, is this: "You can either influence elections, or you can run funds that manage money for public entities. You cannot do both."

It appears that some companies did.

In Chicago, the John Buck Co. is currently listed as a real estate investment manager for two city pension funds. In all, the firm has managed $54 million of city pension money and has earned hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees from those funds since 2011. Executives of the company, which has various business interests before the city government, recently gave more than $47,000 to Emanuels campaign. A firm executive also gave $10,500 to a political action committee that the Chicago Tribune notes Emanuel uses for political activities that support his policy initiatives at City Hall.

The company declined IBTimes request for comment.

Madison Dearborn Partners, a private equity firm, manages Chicago pension money as one of a group of managers in a set of pooled investments. Company executives have contributed more than $52,000 to Emanuel's campaign since 2011. The firm's executives also gave more than $456,000 to two political action committees set up by Emanuel associates to support the mayor.

Though the SEC rule and Emanuel's executive order seem on their face clear and unambiguous, the contributions from Madison Dearborn executives highlight one legal ambiguity that companies managing pension money may be relying on to continue directing cash to campaigns: The firm argues that it is essentially exempt from the restrictions because Madison Dearborn does not directly manage Chicago pension money. Rather, it manages Chicago money that is invested in a pooled investment vehicle known as a fund of funds. Madison Dearborn is one of a handful of companies in a pair of fund-of-funds that get Chicago pension cash.

Madison Dearborn Partners is in full compliance with all SEC rules and legislation, the company said in a written statement.

Public pension systems typically do not release the identities of a fund of funds managers -- sub-advisers, in the relevant legal parlance. They are usually known only by pension officials and the investment firms themselves. The public, meanwhile, can see only the identities of the firms running the entire fund of funds. But documents obtained by IBTimes reveal that one piece of the Chicago pension system, the $5.3 billion Municipal Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund, invests in an Adams Street Partners fund of funds in which Madison Dearborn entities comprise 9 of the 16 total funds.

In other words, Madison Dearborn manages a significant slice of Chicago pension investments.

The SEC has explicitly decreed that managers of a fund of funds are governed by its pay-to-play rules. "It is not appropriate to exclude subadvisers from the rule," the commision said, because otherwise the rule would be compromised by a gaping loophole: Firms that sought to avoid compliance with the rule's strictures could make campaign contributions as they pleased while handling their public pension business exclusively through fund of fund relationships. The agency included provisions barring financial firms from doing "indirectly what [they] could not do directly under the rule."

In an emailed statement, Adams Street CEO T. Bondurant French told IBTimes, "Madison Dearborn Partners is not a sub adviser to Adams Street Partners." When asked about the municipal document showing that 9 of the 16 funds in Adams Streets fund of funds are run by Madison Dearborn Partners, French did not respond.

Attorneys for the law firm Cohen and Milstein, which advises clients on SEC compliance, recently told retirement system trustees gathered at a conference in New Orleans that executives at companies managing public pension money through fund of funds are covered by the rule.

Madison Dearborn maintains it is not obligated under the rule to determine whether it is managing Chicago pension money. But former SEC attorney Dubow says that argument is not good enough.

"You can't just put your head in the sand and say I don't want to know, said Dubow, now a lawyer at the Pepper Hamilton law firm. The onus is going to be on the subadviser to show they didn't know they were managing pension money."

Asked about Mayor Emanuels ban on contributions from municipal subcontractors, Madison Dearborn said it is not a municipal subcontractor, and contended that the executive order does not apply to the citys pension system.

Chicago Alderman Scott Waguespack took issue with that interpretation.

The executive order should apply to the contractors and subcontractors across the board, including in the pension funds, he told IBTimes. That's one of the most lucrative areas where these guys can make money. They are given a large chunk of change to play with and there's little oversight of these financial contracts from any legislative body or organization. Firms doing business with Chicago pension funds are clearly contractors -- trying to say otherwise is splitting hairs to try to say these contributions are legal.

In the John Buck case, city documents show the firm directly manages city pension money -- and earns hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees -- through its own real estate equity funds. At the same time, its executives have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to Emanuels campaign.

John Buck and other real estate firms managing public pension money may be assuming they are not regulated by the SEC or any of the agencys rules.

SEC documents show that while an affiliate of the John Buck Co. had in 2008 been a registered SEC investment adviser, that registration has expired. If the company is not actually managing real estate securities, and is only buying and selling buildings, it may not have to register and therefore may not be subject to SEC rules, said former SEC counsel Scott Kimpel of Hunton & Williams law firm. But a close reading of SEC guidance suggests the rule is designed to cover all investment firms doing business with public pension systems.

David Hoffman, a former Chicago inspector general who served on the Illinois anti-corruption panel formed after the prosecution of Gov. Rod Blagojevich, told IBTimes that while the nuances of pay-to-play laws can be debated and parsed, their intent is obvious.

The purpose of these limitations on campaign contributions is to try to ensure that the city's decisions about who should manage its money are made on the merits, and without regard to any influence that could come from a campaign contribution, Hoffman, who is currently an Emanuel administration appointee, said. It makes sense to understand the rules in light of that purpose -- and especially in light of the problematic history that we've seen in the state and city in that regard."



Comments:

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

1 + 4 =