Sections:

Article

SAT revised (again) but still claiming to measure something that it doesn't

"David Coleman, president of the College Board (and architect of Common Core), announced plans on March 5, 2014, to revise the SAT," reported Diane Ravitch.

Critics now believe that the SAT accurately measures family income, especially the ability to pay the cost of expensive tutors. Coleman says that will change. Currently, the ACT has more test takers than the SAT.

FairTest is not satisfied with the changes. It hopes more colleges will join the ranks of "test optional," since high school grades predict college success better than entry tests.

Bob Schaeffer of FairTest wrote:

National Center for Fair & Open Testing

Bob Schaeffer (239) 395-6773

cell (239) 699-0468

for immediate release, Wednesday, March 5, 2014

NEW SAT PLAN FAILS TO ADDRESS EXAMS MAJOR FLAWS --

WEAK PREDICTIVE VALUE, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO COACHING, AND MISUSE;

UPCOMING OVERHAUL LIKELY TO SPUR TEST-OPTIONAL ADMISSION

Changes to the SAT college admissions test announced today fail to address many major concerns of independent researchers, standardized exam critics, and equity advocates. According to the National Center for Fair & Open Testing (FairTest), the revised test is unlikely to be better than the current one. It will not predict college success more accurately, assess low-income students more fairly, or be less susceptible to high-priced commercial coaching courses.

FairTest Public Education Director Bob Schaeffer explained, The College Boards failure to tackle the SATs historic weaknesses means that more schools will go test-optional. Since the 2005 introduction of a flawed new SAT, nearly 100 additional colleges and universities dropped admissions exam requirements. A recent research report demonstrating that test-optional admissions policies enhance both diversity and academic quality will further accelerate this movement. The truth is no one needs the SAT, either old or new.

Schaeffer continued, Rather than simply making the essay optional to compete with the ACT, now the most popular admissions exam, the College Board should stop misuse of SAT results. The company should refuse to transmit scores to schools and scholarship agencies that improperly require minimum scores for admission or financial aid.

Providing free SAT prep is laudable, but it already exists through programs such as Number2.com. The partnership with the Khan Academy is unlikely to make a dent in the huge market for high-priced, personalized SAT workshops and tutoring that only well-to-do families can afford. Like most of the other College Board initiatives announced today, this move is less significant than its promoters claim.

The first administration of the revised SAT is scheduled for 2016. A database of more than 800 institutions that do not require ACT or SAT scores to make admissions decisions for all or many applicants is online at: http://www.fairtest.org/university/optional

- - 3 0 - -

The following charts are available on request

- Chronology of 95 schools de-emphasizing ACT/SAT use since the last revision of the SAT

- List of 150+ test-optional and test-flexible schools ranked in the top tiers of their respective categories

- Comparison of number of high school students taking the ACT and SAT annually over the past 20 years

- Links to other fact sheets on the SAT and related topics at: http://www.fairtest.org



Comments:

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

5 + 5 =