Why CEOs support Common Core

With the recent Corporate Delta Force effort to defend the Common Core--most notably Bill Gates in USA Today and the New York Times Editorial Board -- those of us in the resistance community figure the Standardistos are running scared.

Very scared.

Bill Gates.Things fall apart; the center cannot hold

I refuse to take the time to swat this New York Times editorial gnat--again--except to say they praise such stuff as this and this for "inventiveness." Of course, nobody at the New York Times read these lessons. New York Times editorial writers base their education judgment on Bill Gates' annual letter and other corporate press releases.

The op ed below (from the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel) is so desperate it resorts to McCarthy tactics, bringing up Lenin in the first sentence. As it happens, Sandra Stotsky and I oppose the Common Core for very different reasons, but I am deeply offended by Barrett's accusation that she lies.

I love it when corporate raiders parrot the drivel that the Common Core was spearheaded by the nation's governors. I'd die happy to see one of the governors who signed on to the Common Core shut up in a room with 28 third graders for an hour. Or 22 kindergartners. Or nine 7th graders. I'll make it easier: Please send me the name of any governor equipped to offer a couple of hours of childcare to one kid. Never mind come up with a curriculum plan.

As someone quipped on Twitter, "Why is it people don't believe anything politicos say--except when they say schools are lousy?"

One has to laugh at the shouts that these governors and their chief state school officer partners can "outline what all students should know."

All students. Every one.

Just to show I can throw around incendiary rhetoric, I'll point out that the co-founder and director of Barrett's operation, Basis Charter Schools, has been a consultant for ALEC.

Justify that.

Surprise. Surprise. Barrett is also chair of the board of directors at Achieve. Go there, and Achieve provides a link to Barrett's views on education reform, where he points out that governors and business leaders "must act in synch, have the same agenda" on education reform. He indicates that all they want to do is "set curriculum expectations." Then he offhandedly adds that teachers can do the rest.

I'd like to see him with those 7th graders--I'd settle for half an hour.

By Craig Barrett

Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel

February 15, 2014

It seems the Common Core State Standards detractors follow Lenin's maxim that, "A lie told often enough becomes the truth." Their most recent foray into trying to take down the effort spearheaded by the nation's governors and chief state school officers to outline what all students should know and be able to do in reading and math leaves us with no choice but to roll up our sleeves and yet again set the record straight.

Sandra Stotsky, holding herself out as a mathematics expert, has been traveling from state to state alleging that the Common Core math standards hold students back from pursuing advanced post-secondary studies in science, math, engineering and technology (STEM) fields. She made this point to Wisconsin legislators in October last year. Stotsky, a former high school French and German teacher, goes so far as to question how leaders of major STEM companies could support the standards. Well, she should just ask.

As a former engineering professor, the former chairman and chief executive of Intel and current CEO of one of the highest-performing charter school systems in the country (BASIS Schools) I can speak directly to why businesses, and, indeed, higher education, benefits from the Common Core, and why concerns about the math standards' rigor are misplaced.

First, the Common Core State Standards are more rigorous than most states' old standards � and the notion that they restrict or limit student learning is a willful misread of them. In fact, the standards ensure that all students master the math skills needed for success � to progress systematically from one concept to the next, to develop the tenacity to solve problems and to understand the logic of math. What is key, and revolutionary, is that the standards will prepare more students to take advanced math coursework by giving all students a better foundation and understanding of mathematics. Students who have mastered the Common Core will be ready to take higher-level math coursework in high school and college, enabling them to pursue the career of their choice, including STEM fields.

Sadly, we don't need more statistics to tell us why our students need higher math standards. U.S. students rank 26th against their international counterparts on mathematics assessments. More than 30% of students enrolled in college require remedial math courses � and that costs students, parents, states and our economy in missed opportunities, hard-earned cash, state tax dollars and wasted resources. Meanwhile, the number of jobs requiring STEM will increase by 26% in the next six years according to the Georgetown's Center on Education and the Workforce. We are unprepared to meet that demand and I, like many business leaders, believe implementing the Common Core is part of the solution.

We are not alone. A study from the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a respected international comparison of student achievement conducted every three years by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), concluded that successful implementation of the Common Core would yield significant performance gains for U.S. students. Those of us in the STEM industry know firsthand how the success of our nation's industries and economy depends on the quality of our schools' math and science education. Those of us in the K-12 education field know that higher expectations and higher standards are key to improving the performance of our students. We also know what STEM skills are needed in today's fastest growing, most innovative industries. So it's no surprise that business leaders and their associations, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable strongly support the Common Core.

We all want our students to be excited about learning, to be challenged and to succeed. And we want our country to be able to compete in a complex world that requires more STEM knowledge and understanding than ever before. I'm encouraged at the prospect of the Common Core improving opportunities for more young people. And I continue to be puzzled as to why the detractors think the status quo is good enough. Not for my grandkids, and not for yours. Full speed ahead with implementation of the Common Core.

Craig Barrett, the former chairman and CEO of Intel, is CEO of BASIS Charter Schools and Chairman of Achieve and Change the Equation.

Read more from Journal Sentinel:

Follow us: @JournalSentinel on Twitter � Craig Barrett with Ohanian deconstruction

Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel

February 15, 2014



November 13, 2014 at 12:38 AM

By: neal resnikoff

Common Core is Common Sense for Business says Chamber of Commerce Foundation President

One main and important truth about the origins and aim of Common Core comes out in the article below. Why the recent silence from educators in Chicago about Common Core? I realize other issues are also important, but why isn't this issue as much out front as it was in Chicago last spring and summer?

Isn't a key reason for the high stakes testing mess, for example?

McKernan: Common Core is Common Sense for Business

October 16, 2014

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation President John R. McKernan made the business case for the Common Core State Standards Wednesday during a meeting of business leaders in Ohio.

Speaking to members of the Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce, McKernan said higher standards are a crucial to ensuring an educated and skilled workforce needed for the jobs of the 21st century.

�We need a steady pipeline of talent,� McKernan said. �That means as one generation of American workers winds down their careers, the next one is ready to go. And we need our public K-12 education system to be the strong foundation upon which all of this is built.�

Support for Common Core has been a priority of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation and its Center for Education and Workforce. The standards are designed to provide a foundation for what students should know at each grade level, regardless of where they live or their economic circumstances.

�We must proactively make the case for why we must raise the standards in our schools,� McKernan said. �It�s important for our economic strength at the national and state levels, our competitive standing in the world, and for the continued success of our students.�

McKernan noted the disconnect between the number of jobs open in America and the number of unemployed people. Recent figures from the Department of Labor reported 4.8 million jobs unfilled, yet nearly 10 million unemployed.

�The skills gap is putting great distance between unemployed or under-qualified Americans and many of the stable, high-paying jobs in the fastest growing industries,� he said.

McKernan encouraged the business leaders in the room to remain engaged even as these issues become contentious, �Business is the largest single consumer of the education system. We can�t afford to be passive consumers. It�s important for us in the business community to not only engage in the debate, but to help lead it.�

Ohio adopted the standards which are aligned to college and career in 2010 and fully implemented them during the 2013-14 school year. The business community, led by the state and local chambers of commerce in Ohio, has been a leading advocate and vocal supporter for staying the course on implementation of the standards as well as aligned assessments to ensure students are meeting these higher expectations.

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

5 + 1 =