Sections:

Article

More Than A Score challenges CPS promotion policy... Demands return to teacher grades as the real assessment

"More Than A Score" continued the launch of a year of test resistance in Chicago with a press conference at the Chicago Public Schools headquarters on the morning of November12, 2013. Their statement follows:

"More Than a Score recently presented CPS with an alternative promotion policy that relies primarily on report card grades and uses standardized test scores in the way they were intended to be used -- as diagnostic tools and not high-stakes gotcha measures.

"We believe that report cards are the only evaluations that look at the students work over time and across all areas of learning. They are the only evaluations done by experienced, qualified adults who personally observe and assess each students progress. Thats the kind of information that makes sense to parents and actually helps children. When we get our childrens standardized test scores at the end of the year, we dont get to see the questions or their answers. We have no idea whether they missed a certain concept or were just distracted for part of the test. In any case, our children are so over-tested that these results have become less and less useful to parents.

"The CPS promotion policy begins and ends with the state test score. Most of the information from report cards is ignored by CPS when end-of-the-year promotion decisions are made.

"Parents who have opted their children out of standardized tests are also confused and concerned because the new promotion policy just swapped one high-stakes test (the SAT-10), for another (NWEA), making opting out more difficult. Since the promotion policy was first implemented in 1996 by Paul Vallas, it has focused on test scores on the Iowa test, then the IGAP, ISAT, and SAT 10. The new proposal substitutes the NWEA, which CPS officials say is just temporary until they replace it with the PARCC Common Core tests.

"How are parents supposed to keep track of this alphabet soup of tests? Will students be held back next August because they didnt take a test that their parents decided to opt them out of last September?

"Policymakers often cite the subjective nature of teacher grades as a reason for giving them less weight than standardized tests scores. However, test questions are written by subjective human beings, too, and test makers consistently state that their tests should not be used to make high-stakes decisions about children. The manual for the SAT-10, which CPS used last year to retain students, states that test scores should be just one of the many factors considered and probably should receive less weight than factors such as teacher observation, day-to-day classroom performance, maturity level, and attitude just the kind of information in report cards.

"Whats so wrong with report cards, anyway? If CPS does not trust teacher grades, they need to explain why and what they are doing to fix it. Most parents trust teacher grades more than for-profit testing companies.

"More Than a Score believes that our proposed promotion policy offers an alternative to the CPS test-based promotion policy that respects input from teachers, avoids the pitfalls of standardized test misuse and retention, makes sense to parents, and most importantly provides a higher quality evaluation of each students progress and needs."

?



Comments:

November 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM

By: Jean Schwab

tests

I just handed out Too Many Tests flyers at my grandson's school. I found people very receptive. They wanted to use the sample form on the back. I hope that is ok.

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

2 + 4 =