Last minute language in debt deal gives windfall to Teach for America... Congress rules that TFA's FNGs are 'highly qualified' by definition

As everyone in Chicago learns the hard way, the only way you can stop legislation from harming you is to watch every word up until the final minute when the General Assembly approves it. Corporate "school reform" groups have perfected the art of sneaking last minute changes into legislative language to get their way, as the Chicago Teachers Union leadership learned the hard way in December 2010 and January 2011, when Advance Illinois and Stand for Children helped some legislators craft the infamous Senate Bill 7 to their liking. The legislation was supposed to make it impossible for the Chicago Teachers Union to strike by requiring a 75 percent vote of all the union's members (not just a majority of those voting) to authorize a strike. Thanks to careful planning, the union leadership under President Karen Lewis was able to surpass the 75 percent, getting a strike authorization vote of 90 percent of the union's members in a June 2012 referendum. The vote helped make certain the Chicago Teachers Strike of 2012 was "legal," even under the discriminatory laws against Chicago that Illinois had at the time.

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan (left) and President Barack Obama have been promoting union busting and teacher bashing since Obama took office in January 2009 and made Duncan the U.S. Secretary of Education.But the tricks of the corporate reformers are not limited to Springfield Illinois. Since the election of Barack Obama President of the United States in 2008, the federal government has been openly hostile to teacher unions and openly allied with the corporate reformers on everything from charter school proliferation to the use of untrained college graduates through quickie programs like Teach for America.

So it is little surprise that while the world was distracted by the fury over the possible debt default of the United States of American, TFA allies slipped a passage into the law that will be worth millions to the anti union group headed by Wendy Kopp. And once again the dirty work was done by a "liberal" Democrat, in this case Tom Karken of Iowa.

The Washington Post reported on October 17, 2013 as follows:

The debt deal’s gift to Teach For America (yes, TFA)


October 16 at 11:32 pm

More 22 Comments

(By J. Scott Applewhite/AP )

(Update: Harkin office confirms he worked to get the measure in the bill)

Unobtrusively slipped into the debt deal that Congress passed late Wednesday night to reopen the federal government after 16 days and allow the United States to keep borrowing money to pay its bills is a provision about school reform that will make Teach For America very happy.

In language that does not give a hint about its real meaning, the deal extends by two years legislation that allows the phrase “highly qualified teachers” to include students still in teacher training programs — and Teach For America’s recruits who get five weeks of summer training shortly after they have graduated from college, and are then placed in some of America’s neediest schools.

On page 20 of this bill passed by the House, it says:

SEC. 145. Subsection (b) of section 163 of Public 5 Law 111-242, as amended, is further amended by striking 6 ”2013-2014” and inserting ”2015-2016”.

The law that is being amended includes the highly qualified provision, which Teach For America and other school reformers had persuaded legislators to pass a few years ago.

Under No Child Left Behind, all children are supposed to have highly qualified teachers, school districts are supposed to let parents know which teachers are not highly qualified, and these teachers are supposed to be equitably distributed in schools. They aren’t. It turns out that teachers still in training programs are disproportionately concentrated in schools serving low-income students and students of color, the very children who need the very best the teaching profession has to offer. The inequitable distribution of these teachers also has a disproportionate impact on students with disabilities.

The person who pushed the language into the bill was Sen. Tom Harkin, the Iowa Democrat who is chairman of the Senate’s education committee and a big Teach For America supporter. According to a statement from his communications director, Kate Cyrul Frischmann a spokesman, “Senator Harkin, in his role as Chairman of the education appropriations subcommittee, worked with members on both sides of the aisle to include the teacher qualification language in the CR.” The Obama administration is a big TFA supporter too, having awarded tens of millions of dollars to the organization over the past several years. Administration officials have never offered a public explanation about why someone with five weeks of training should be deemed “highly qualified.”

Congress first approved legislation allowing student teachers and others with little training to be deemed “highly qualified” in late 2010, shortly after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the definition violated NCLB. In 2011 a coalition of more than 50 organizations — including education, civil rights, disability, student, parent, and community groups – urged Obama in this letter not to keep the definition, but it did anyway.

Another letter was sent to President Obama last May by a long list of organizations asking the administration for a “state-by-state picture on the number of students in certain subgroups being taught by teachers-in-training through alternative routes to certification.” This data is required to be produced by the end of this year but the U.S. Department of Education has not yet collected the statistics, according to Kenneth Zeichner, a professor of teacher education at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Zeichner calls the “highly qualified” teacher definition approved by Congress a charade on the American public. Read why here.


Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

2 + 5 =