Sections:

Article

Cost and abuse of Chicago testing becomes major issue during and following the September 28, 2011 meeting of the Chicago Board of Education

Substance editor Sharon Schmidt (a Chicago high school teacher and mother of two sons attending CPS schools) testifies before the September 28, 2011 meeting of the Chicago Board of Education about excessive testing. Substance photo by George N. Schmidt.With the intention of alerting the public to the problems with the CPS testing program and to obtain Board financial information, this reporter spoke at the September 28, 2011, Chicago Board of Education meeting.

The following are my prepared remarks, which I read, along with some of the dialogue that followed with Board president David Vitale.

Good morning. My name is Sharon Schmidt. I am the editor of Substance, the Chicago newspaper that covers public education. I am a step-parent of a Chicago public high school graduate. My husband and I have two children who attend a Chicago public elementary school. I am a high school teacher and the chairperson of the Chicago Teachers Union testing committee.

I am here on behalf of the CTU testing committee, but before I speak about testing I am going to make a suggestion about these board meetings. Why not hold the meetings during after school hours in the neighborhoods at schools with large auditoriums and free parking?

It is very difficult for people to attend these downtown meetings during the workday. Many more parents and teachers would like to be here, but can’t take the day off. In addition, the seats are limited here. Right now there are dozens of people who did come here this morning to attend the meeting, but since there is not enough space here they’re sitting in a room on the 15th floor watching this on a video screen.

Why don’t you hold the Board meetings as they used to be — in the schools, after school — so that more people could attend? How does that sound?

Board of Education Vice President Jesse Ruiz (left background), Board Attorney Patrick Rocks (center), and Board President David Vitale (under the Great Seal of the Chicago Board of Education) listen while Sharon Schmidt challenges their spending on testing during the September 28, 2011 Board meeting. Substance photo by George N. Schmidt.Vitale said something non-committal. I added, "In the past, they were every other month — sometimes here sometimes in the schools." Then I continued with my prepared remarks.

Now I’m going to speak about the problems with the CPS testing program, which can be categorized under three main headings: • excessive,

• experimental, and

• expensive.

CPS is administering an excessive number of tests. Not only are you using the federal and state required tests, ACCESS for English Language Learners, the multi-test ISAT, the EXPLORE, PLAN, ACT and Work Keys (which you administer to high school students several times each year) there are other series of tests you administer multiple times a year to students, from pre-K through 12th grade. The Kindergarten Readiness Test, mClass math, DIBELS, Scantron Performance Series are common from pre-K through 9th grade, but in some schools you administer even more, such as benchmark assessments, KLT, MAP, Riverside Achieve Data, Step, and additional area-created, 5-week assessments. Our students are bombarded with tests, multiple times a year.

You’re experimenting with our children, administering test after test, obsessively gathering data. But our children are not lab mice or test tube specimen. Extracting data hurts them. Each test takes away from academic, social, and emotional learning that they should be getting in school. The tests stifle their curiosity and love of learning. Then you harm our children with your overemphasis on test scores (which are just comparisons with other children) giving our children two odious choices: “I’m better than others,” or “I’m worse than others.” Of course your testing experiment hits our most disadvantaged students the hardest. You test our poorest students in segregated schools the most.

Now here’s my question. We know the testing program is excessive, we know it’s experimental, we know it’s unnecessary, but how expensive is it? How much is CPS paying for testing this year? Chicago Board of Education President David Vitale, a millionaire, covered his mouth regularly, making it difficult for the public to hear his comments during the September 28 meeting of the Chicago Board of Education. Vitale was appointed to the Board in May 2011 by Mayor Rahm Emanuel. To the right (front) in the above photograph is "Chief Education Officer" Noemi Donoso, who knows nothing about Chicago's public schools, having been appointed to her $200,000-per-year job in June 2011. She came from Denver and elsewhere, where her speciality had been charter schools. Substance photo by George N. Schmidt.Following the presentation there was a long, silent pause. No one spoke for 11 seconds. The Board members, Cheif Executive Officer Jean Claude Bizzard, and other administrators just stared at this reporter. Finally, I spoke again:

"We have a freedom of information request to Cassandra Daniels, and we would like to know how much we are spending on testing."

Vitale responded by saying the FOIA would be answered. He added that I had made a lot of “wild accusations” without any statistics.

“Okay, here’s a statistic,” I said. “A kid, an average kid, by the time he hits 8th grade is going to take more than 100 tests.”

“My daughter is in elementary school and she’s taking tests every day and it isn’t a problem,” Vitale said. “I don’t know what you’re talking about.”

“I’m not talking about teacher-produced tests,” this reporter said. “I am a teacher. I assess my students regularly. I create tests on the unit that we are covering. Those are good tests. Those tests go back to my students. They can learn what they haven’t gotten. They can see how they did, see if they are mastering the curriculum. I’m talking about corporate-produced tests — the Scantron Performance Series tests, the various iterations of the Riverside test. There are so many new tests. I just talked to a principal this morning. In addition to the tri-yearly, multiple-test Scantron Performance Series tests, he just heard from his Area that he needs to do a quarterly test. What is the point?”

Sharon Schmidt discusses the excessive and expensive CPS testing programs with fellow reporters outside the Chicago Board of Education chambers during the September 28, 2011, meeting of the Board. Substance photo by George N. Schmidt.Vitale mentioned that CPS has an office of education and that he would talk to people there to try to find out, but it would be difficult to find the information.

“Oh my goodness,” I said. “Ask the teachers. We have asked the teachers. In our committee we have surveyed delegates in every school in Chicago: 'How many tests are you giving in your schools?' Find out what is going on in the different schools in the system. I would hope that would be among your first jobs: Find out what is going on in each school. Some of these kids, with the primary grade DIBELS tests, they’re taking them every two weeks.”

“Thank you,” Vitale said.

“You’re welcome,” I said.



Comments:

September 15, 2012 at 1:47 AM

By: Bridget Duggan

Did they get back to you?

unreal. Or, I suppose, typical.

So how much is being spent on testing?

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

2 + 3 =