Sections:

Article

There is a 'magic bullet' for improving children's literacy: Libraries and trained librarians

The following letter was sent to the Desert News (Utah), March 24, 2010

In "Reading scores hold steady on nationwide test" (March 24), Sacramento Superintendent David Gordon is quoted as saying that "there is no magic bullet" for improved academic performance.

There certainly is a magic bullet for literacy development. It's called libraries. Study after study shows that those with more access to books read more, and those who read more read better, write better, spell better, have larger vocabularies, better grammar and know more, not just about school subjects but about "practical knowledge" as well.

Studies also show that children get a significant percentage of their reading material from libraries, and that better public libraries, better school libraries, and the presence of a credentialed school librarian are related to higher reading achievement.

Let's invest some of that money destined for new standards and tests in libraries and librarians.



Comments:

March 27, 2010 at 10:36 PM

By: John Whitfield

Comprehensive Input

And, as in Krashen's "Theory of Comprehensive

Input", it is no different for those who are learning English as a second language, ESL. That is, given the student already reads in his / her first language, L 1, then it is just a matter of getting high interest / easy read materials in English, the second language, L 2.

If we allow students to continue to develop L 1, and even allow for instruction in other subjects in L 1, then the transfer of concepts into L 2, comes about more readily,

given that comprehsive English as a second language, ESL, is given the same quantity of reading materials for ELL (English Language Learners)as any other group of students that Krahen describes above.

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

5 + 5 =