MEDIA WATCH: The Reader gets the story about the Elected School Board bill, but the Sun-Times misses it? Aren't they owned by the same guy?... As Substance used to say -- OIC!...

Illinois State Rep. Robert Martwick (at podium) announces that he has introduced a bill in Springfield for an elected school board for Chicago. Reader photo.Back when Substance was only in print, one of our regular columnists reported as "Sister Grim" and did a monthly page called "A Grim Fairy Tale." Usually, the Grim Fairy Tale ended with the phrase "OIC". That mean "Only in Chicago." And so when Substance learned that a major piece of legislation had been introduced in Springfield -- with 40 co-sponors! -- for an elected school board, Substance reporters and editors went back to the print edition of the Chicago Sun-Times. And there was nothing about this important piece of legislation in the August 13 2015 print edition.

Ironically, since the Reader is owned by the same guy (a friend of Rahm for those who didn't already know), we were interested to read that the Reader's Ben Joravsky was immediately on the story. Substance is reporting that story at the top of our Home Page on the morning of August 14, 2015. All we can say, before we read the print edition of the Sun-Times on August 14 (it'll be delivered here in about an hour...) is "OIC!!!"

And in honor of the new digital age and the 21st Century, "WTF!!??"

To be fair, the morning on line edition of the Chicago Tribune on August 14, 2015, is also ignoring the story. But Tribune fans can read a lot of celebrity gossip and other stuff, even if the Chicago elected school board is not "news".

Below is the Reader story:

Look out, Rahmthe elected school board movement is back!. Posted By Ben Joravsky on 08.13.15 at 01:30 PM

State rep Robert Martwick and supporters introduce an elected school board bill at Tuesday's press conference.

The movement for an elected school board is a little like Gypsy Joe Harris, the legendary one-eyed welterweight from the 60s. Just when you thought he was down for the count, he'd come back fighting even harder.

And thus it was Tuesday, when a merry band of state reps, aldermen, and activists gathered at the Thompson Center to unveil a proposed bill that would create an elected school board.

Currently, our school board's appointed by the mayor. And the current mayoroh, what's his name?wants to keep it that way, despite repeated efforts by activists to turn Chicago into something resembling a 21st-century democracy.

The sponsor of the legislation is, of all people, state rep Robert Martwick, who hails from a politically well-connected Democratic family on the the northwest side. Apparently Martwick realizes that it's in his best interest to gain a little distance from the mayor's record on schools.

"I can't promise that an elected school board will make the schools better," says Martwick. "My motivation is simpleI'm a democracy purist. Our system functions better when we have power in the hands of people."

As a veteran of this long-shot crusade, I want to welcome to Representative Martwick to the cause and predict the counterargument he will get from the mayor and his allies. It goes like this . . .

We can't have an elected school board because that would wind up with Karen Lewis and her teachers union running the system!

This observation is preposterous for several reasons, starting with the notion that Lewis oversees a mighty electoral machine.

With all due respect to my old friends at the Chicago Teachers Union, they're only marginally better than I am at getting the people they endorse elected.

And my endorsement has historically been the kiss of death.

It's ludicrous to think the teachers' union has the money, bodies, or clout to stomp the mayor's well-financed political machine and seize complete control of the school board.

At best, they might help elect one or two independent school board members. Sort of like their track record at electing aldermen.

Still, that would be a big improvement on the seven rubber-stampers we currently have.

Hell, Karen Lewis and I could come up with a better board than this bunch over a lunch of corned beef on rye at Manny's delicatessen.

The big problem with mayorally appointed school boards is that the appointees do whatever the mayor tells them. Even if that means spending pension money on things other than pensions. Or letting the mayor divert hundreds of millions of property tax dollars for his slush fund. Or signing on to horrendous borrowing deals in which we pay back existing loans by taking out new ones.

And you wonder why the schools have been broke for so long.

Sad to say, I don't think Martwick's bill will be signed into law anytime soon.

Governor Rauner's already announced he's against it on the grounds that it will give too much power to the teachers' union.

Apparently, Rauner thinks teacher unions are only useful as a source for him to make money.

Mayor Emanuel's against it because it gives him less control. And boy, does he loves control.

It's not clear whether house speaker Michael Madigan will bury the bill in the rules committeewhere he stashes bills he wants to killor let it go to the education committee for a hearing.

I urge speaker Madigan to let the bill live.

At the very least, he can then extract something from Mayor Rahm for eventually killing it.

Like Speaker Madigan hasn't figured that out already.

"If I lose with this bill, I'll continue," says Martwick. "I plan to build support for this movement. How can you be against democracy?"

Just call him Gypsy Joe Martwick.


Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

5 + 1 =