[GOP Racist Voter Interference] Ballot Security Task Force (1981)

The National Ballot Security Task Force (BSTF) was a controversial group founded in 1981 in New Jersey by the Republican National Committee (RNC) as a means of intimidating voters and discouraging voter turnout among likely Democratic voters in the gubernatorial election. The group's activities prompted the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to bring a federal lawsuit, alleging a violation of the Voting Rights Act, illegal harassment, and voter intimidation. The RNC and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree in 1982, barring them from engaging in further such conduct until 2017. The RNC unsuccessfully tried to lift the consent decree early; these attempts were rejected by the federal courts each time. The consent decree was set to expire on December 1, 2017. Democrats sought an extension to it based on allegations of new conduct, but the request was denied in January 2018 and the decree expired.[1]

The task force consisted of a group of armed, off-duty police officers wearing armbands, who were hired to patrol polling sites in African-American and Hispanic neighborhoods of Newark and Trenton.

The National Ballot Security Task Force (BSTF) was a controversial group founded in 1981 in New Jersey by the Republican National Committee (RNC) as a means of intimidating voters and discouraging voter turnout among likely Democratic voters in the gubernatorial election. The group's activities prompted the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to bring a federal lawsuit, alleging a violation of the Voting Rights Act, illegal harassment, and voter intimidation. The RNC and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree in 1982, barring them from engaging in further such conduct until 2017. The RNC unsuccessfully tried to lift the consent decree early; these attempts were rejected by the federal courts each time. The consent decree was set to expire on December 1, 2017. Democrats sought an extension to it based on allegations of new conduct, but the request was denied in January 2018 and the decree expired.

Overview

Further information: New Jersey gubernatorial election, 1981

The task force consisted of a group of armed, off-duty police officers wearing armbands, who were hired to patrol polling sites in African-American and Hispanic neighborhoods of Newark and Trenton.[2]

Initially, 45,000 letters were mailed (using an outdated voter registration list) to primarily Latino and African-American citizens.[3] Many of these letters were later returned as non-deliverable, and the 45,000 addresses were used to create a list of voters.[4] These voters were then challenged by the BSTF, a practice known as voter caging.[5]

In addition, the Republican National Committee filed a request for election supervisors to strike these voters from the rolls, but the commissioners of registration refused when they discovered that the RNC had used outdated information.[6]

On New Jersey's election day in 1981, the BSTF posted large signs, without identification but with an official appearance, reading

WARNING

THIS AREA IS BEING PATROLLED BY THE

NATIONAL BALLOT

SECURITY TASK FORCE

IT IS A CRIME TO FALSIFY A BALLOT OR

TO VIOLATE ELECTION LAWS[7][8]

Armed members of the Task Force "were drawn from the ranks of off-duty county deputy sheriffs and local police," who "prominently displayed revolvers, two-way radios, and BSTF armbands."[6] BSTF patrols "challenged and questioned voters at the polls and blocked the way of some prospective voters" in predominantly African-American and Hispanic areas.[6] Democrat James J. Florio lost the gubernatorial election to Republican Thomas H. Kean by 1,797 votes.[6]

1982 lawsuit and consent decree

A civil lawsuit was filed after the election by the DNC, which alleged that the RNC had violated the Voting Rights Act[9] and engaged in illegal harassment and voter intimidation.[10] The suit was settled in 1982, when the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee, instead of a trial, signed a consent decree in U.S. District Court saying that they would not allow tactics that could intimidate Democratic voters, though they did not admit any wrongdoing.[9][11][12]

The consent decree, entered on November 1, 1982,[12] prevented the Republican Party "from engaging in activities that suppress the vote, particularly when it comes to minority voters."[13] It also barred the wearing of armbands at polling places.[13] Under the consent decree "the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed 'ballot security' programs, including any proposed voter caging."[12] The consent decree was set to expire in December 2017.[14] A successor consent decree, applying to several states, was entered on July 27, 1987.[12]

Republican attempts to lift consent decree

The Republican Party has attempted several times, unsuccessfully, to terminate the consent decree, arguing that it is "antiquated" and unnecessary.[9] The Democratic National Committee had countered by arguing that "recent campaigns show the 'consent degree remains necessary today.'"[9] In 2009, a New Jersey federal judge rejected the RNC's request to vacate the consent decree, and this ruling was unanimously affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 2012.[12][15] The Supreme Court declined to hear the RNC's appeal in 2013.[9]

2016 motion

On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey to find that the RNC had violated the consent decree.[12] The motion was filed after the campaign of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump suggested, without evidence, that the election was "rigged" in favor of his opponent Hillary Clinton and urged Trump supporters to watch the polls to combat supposed "voter fraud."[16][14] The DNC also sought to extend the duration of the consent decree.[16] A shortened discovery occurred, and on November 5 the court denied the request. The court determined that the DNC did not present "sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations" but did "allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election."[12]

Expiration of consent decree

The consent decree restricting Republican Party conduct was set to expire on December 1, 2017, but Democrats sought an extension,[17][18] alleging that statements from Donald Trump campaign officials showed the RNC had engaged in activities in violation of the decree.[18] U.S. District Judge John Michael Vazquez allowed the Democratic Party to take the deposition of Sean Spicer before issuing a decision on whether the decree should be allowed to expire, but denied Democrats' motions for hearings on the issue.[18] On January 8, Judge John Vasquez ruled that the decree had expired on December 1, and would not be extended.[1]

The 2020 presidential election will be the first presidential election since 1980 in which the Republican Party will be able to deploy "ballot security operations". In 2019 Justin R. Clark, an official in Trump's re-election campaign, was recorded telling Republican lawyers that the expiration of the consent decree was a "huge, huge, huge, huge deal" for the campaign's election day operations in Wisconsin.[19] In March 2020 the RNC announced plans to mobilize 50,000 poll watchers to swing states, while Trump described plans to mobilise law enforcement as poll watchers, and the True the Vote group sought to recruit police officers and military veterans. The political scientist Kenneth Mayer of the University of Wisconsin–Madison argued in August 2020 that the lifting of the consent decree raised the prospect of a return to practices of voter intimidation, while Justin Levitt of Loyola Law School argued that the RNC was unlikely to have the capacity to mobilize such numbers.[20][21] In October 2020 the Trump campaign said it had enlisted more than 50,000 volunteer poll watchers in swing states.[22] In a September 2020 opinion column, Florio likened Trump's rhetoric to the use of voter intimidation in the 1981 campaign.[23]

References

GERSTEIN, JOSH. "Judge ends consent decree limiting RNC 'ballot security' activities". POLITICO. Retrieved September 10, 2018.

Sullivan, Joseph F. (November 13, 1993). "Florio's Defeat Revives Memories of G.O.P. Activities in 1981". New York Times.

Toobin, Jeffrey (September 20, 2004). "Poll Position". The New Yorker.

Smith, Glenn W. (2004). The Politics of Deceit: Saving Freedom and Democracy from Extinction. John Wiley and Sons. p. 124. ISBN 0-471-66763-3. Retrieved October 7, 2008.

Levitt, Justin (June 29, 2007). "Reported Instances of Voter Caging". Brennan Center for Justice. New York University School of Law.

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary (October 5, 2004). S. Hrg. 108–694: Maximizing Voter Choice (PDF). Government Printing Office, Serial No. J–108–98. p. 65.

Felzenberg, Alvin S. (2006). Governor Tom Kean. Rutgers University Press. p. 184. ISBN 0-8135-3799-1. Retrieved October 7, 2008.

Larsen, Erik (October 27, 2016). "NJ's 1981 vote: Armed men at the polls". Asbury Park Press. Retrieved November 2, 2016.

David G. Savage, Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree, Los Angeles Times (January 14, 2013).

Piven, Frances Fox; Cloward, Richard A. (2000). Why Americans Still Don't Vote. Beacon Press. p. 245. ISBN 0-8070-0449-9. Retrieved October 7, 2008.

Raymond, Allen (2008). How to Rig an Election. Simon & Schuster. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-4165-5222-2. Retrieved October 7, 2008.

"DNC v. RNC Consent Decree". Brennan Center for Justice. New York University School of Law. November 5, 2016.

Katz, Matt (September 1, 2016). "Armed Men Once Patrolled the Polls. Will They Reappear in November?". WNYC News.

"Rachel Maddow Versus the Poll Watchers". The Advocate. October 25, 2016.

Democratic National Committee v. Republican National Committee, 673 F.3d 192 (3d Cir. 2012).

Matt Friedman (October 27, 2016). "Democrats: RNC violating anti-voter intimidation agreement". Politico.

Salant, Jonathan D. (December 29, 2017). "Here's what Sean Spicer said in N.J. voter intimidation case". NJ.com. NJ Advance Media.

Friedman, Matt (December 29, 2017). "After questioning Spicer, Democrats want to depose Priebus about election night activities". Politico.

Gellman, Barton (November 2020). "The Election That Could Break America". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 24, 2020.

Pilkington, Ed (August 24, 2020). "In 1981 a 'task force' intimidated voters at the polls. Will Republicans revert to their old tactics?". The Guardian. Retrieved September 14, 2020.

Helderman, Rosalind S.; Dawsey, Josh; Zapotosky, Matt (August 22, 2020). "Trump's suggestion of deploying law enforcement officials to monitor polls raises specter of voting intimidation". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 14, 2020.

Isenstadt, Alex; Korecki, Natasha (October 8, 2020). "Trump campaign ready to unleash thousands of poll watchers on Election Day". Politico. Retrieved October 9, 2020.

Florio, James J. (September 13, 2020). "Armed men at N.J.'s Black, Latino polling places? Ex-gov. warns it has happened before". NJ.com. Retrieved September 14, 2020.



Comments:

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

5 + 3 =