Qualified 'victory' in W. Virginia teachers' strike?... Rank and file militancy in a 'right to work' state...Strikers demand to read entire contract before reopening schools...

The teachers strike in West Virginia continues as of this writing (the evening of Thursday, March 1, 2018). The AFT and NEA state federations tried to cut a deal with Governor Jim Justice, where Wednesday was to be a "cooling off" day. But teachers have stayed out, insisting that the state legislature put the agreement in writing, before going back.

Striking West Virginia teachers. New York Times photo.The strike is notable for union militants on many points: the strike appears to have been organized by rank and file, and not by the union apparatus as such. The strike is statewide, in a state with a newly minted Right-to-Work law. The strike is "unlawful" -- and yet workers have struck for six days and counting, without consequence to this point.

Massachusetts educator and labor writer discusses the Janus issue at length and cogently, in her In These Times Piece from last Saturday. The New Republic piece notes many of the militant features of the strike, and some of the backstory."

A significant analysis, in light of the upcoming Janus decision by the Supreme Court, was published by Lois Weiner:

West Virginia Teachers Are Showing How Unions Can Win Power Even If They Lose Janus

BY Lois Weiner

Today’s “Workers’ Day of Action,” organized by AFL-CIO affiliates and labor groups, aimed to

show the labor movement’s opposition to a verdict for the plaintiffs in Janus v. AFSCME, which

begins oral arguments before the Supreme Court on Monday. Unions fear their power will be

diminished if the Court rules against AFSCME, as it is expected to do, and restricts public-sector

unions from collecting fees from non-members to pay for collective bargaining. The Right

intends to use Janus to gut public employee unions, weakening what is the strongest

constituency in organized labor. This in turn will greatly diminish labor’s strength as a

progressive force.

Public employee unions are right to be worried, and yet, as today’s demonstrations evidenced, on

the eve of oral arguments labor is still grappling with how to protect workers’ rights. The

protest’s slogan, “It’s about freedom,” mimics the Right’s own language when it argues that

unions shouldn’t be able to collect fees from workers who don’t want to pay. In fact, it's about

social justice: The struggle to protect collective bargaining is a fight for the dignity of work and

working people.

How then can public employee unions and the labor movement transition from defense to

offense, winning economic and political demands? Must a defeat in Janus mean the end of

public employee unions? A movement of school employees in West Virginia is providing answers

to these questions, showing organized labor how workers can defend their rights without the

legal protections that unions rely upon: the right to strike and the right to bargain collectively.

West Virginia bars strikes by public employees and, as a so-called “right to work” state, bans

unions from requiring that everyone represented by a bargaining unit become a dues-paying

member. Yet, despite this hostile legal environment, school employees, led primarily by teachers,

organized walkouts that resulted in closure of schools in every county on Thursday and Friday.

School districts could not remain open because school employees had shown they would not

come to work. Although officers of the American Federation of Teachers –West Virginia (AFTWV)

and the West Virginia Education Association (WVEA), the state affiliates of the two major

teachers unions, are quoted in the press and are widely seen as the movement’s leaders, they are

not the force behind the job actions.

As when Detroit teachers organized “sick outs” about appalling conditions in their schools, the

West Virginia teachers who took the lead in organizing this movement did so independent of the

union apparatus. They invited teachers in both AFT-WV and WVEA, which many activists felt

had wasted resources wrangling with one another. As one teacher-leader explained to In These

Times, the strategy from the start was “keeping it open.” For this reason, teachers brought in

other school employees in planning actions and demands.

School workers were frustrated and angry about low wages, further diminished by growing

health insurance costs. Within months, the movement mushroomed, with the closed Facebook

page expanding to 17,000 members. (Although I am not a West Virginia school employee, I was

invited to join the closed group because my writing about teacher unionism has informed the

organizing. I have commented and posted, making clear that I am a visitor to their site.)

2/27/2018 West Virginia Teachers Are Showing How Unions Can Win Power Even If They Lose Janus - In These Times 2/3

West Virginia is a red state, but one in which union pride and an attunement to class inequality

still bubble up. Bernie Sanders won the Democratic primary, and memories of the state’s history

of labor battles in the coal fields still resonate. Many teachers in the state identify as workers and

with unions, not always the case among teachers.

Understanding this movement’s success requires seeing that the WVEA and AFT-WV, which

ostensibly spoke for teachers and other school workers, failed to tap into or build this labor

consciousness. Instead of mobilizing actions that addressed anger at poor wages, the unions’

strategy was to court state politicians with donations and votes. As I learned in conversations

over the past several months, the activists who built the grassroots movement, many of them

socialists, believed that traditional labor tactics, ranging from rallies to walkouts, were essential

and that their colleagues throughout the state would respond.

They were right. The movement developed at breathtaking speed. Protests and local walkouts

expanded to a state-wide strike and mass protests in the state Capitol. Teachers and school

workers confronted legislators who had failed to raise wages while rising healthcare costs cut

into teachers’ paychecks. At each step, the movement has made demands on the union and

prepared to carry out actions without union endorsement or help. In the process they have gone

far in making the union carry out its responsibilities to them—and to public education. A key

concern of teachers is that by keeping wages so low, West Virginia has created a teacher

“shortage” that it has “solved” by allowing people who have no preparation to teach to become

teachers—a strategy being adopted in many other states.

The West Virginia struggle has mirrored the energy of the 2012 Chicago Teachers Union strike,

which electrified teachers throughout the world and set a new standard for militant union action

in the U.S. But it also resembles what occurred in Madison, Wisc., when public employees, with

teachers in the forefront, took their defense of collective bargaining to the state legislature,

occupying the seat of power. Labor was badly bruised in that battle because workers did what

union officials instructed: They disbanded the protest and channeled power into recalling Gov.

Scott Walker. The alternative would have been maintaining the strike while building more public

support by expanding their political program beyond collective bargaining, to other economic

and political rights that have been attacked.

This same choice confronts the movement in West Virginia. One logical expansion of their

political struggle is to demand more progressive funding for schools and a statewide “single

payer” health plan to cover medical care for everyone in the state. Public employees who face

higher healthcare costs will find natural allies in parents who cannot afford insurance or are

worried about cutbacks to Medicaid and Medicare because the fight will be to alleviate health

care costs for everyone, rather than only protecting costs for public employees. Such an alliance

would join the growing movement within labor for “Medicare for all,” a struggle that requires

taking on Democrats who won’t break with their party leadership’s rejection of “single payer” as

unrealistic. The demand can also weaken the grip of Republicans who won’t break with the

GOP’s—and Trump‘s—refusal to fund healthcare as a human right.

Officers of large public employee unions say that Janus has caused deep introspection and

change. While public employee unions are reaching out to “involve,” “engage” and “hear”

members, the need for the self-organization of workers is seldom expressed in this narrative of

change—except in unions in which reform caucuses have won leadership, like the Massachusetts

Teachers Association.

The consciousness and capacity of workers to organize at the work site is what will save labor.

West Virginia’s school employees have demonstrated what workers’ power looks like without

collective bargaining or the right to strike. Their lesson is clear to the unions: Either fight for the

dignity of work and workers or move over and let others show you how it’s done.

Add this to the other two articles: