OPT OUT NEWS: 'Organized Confusion: PARCC Hypocrisy, Bullying, and Fear-Mongering in CPS... An Open Letter to Barbara Byrd-Bennett, CEO of Chicago Public Schools...' with a 'cc' to Mayor Rahm Emanuel....
[Editor's Note: As we have been pointing out here at substancenews.net for years, and especially this year as the "Opt Out Explosion" has exploded in Chicago, across Illinois, and nationally, most teachers and principals are trying to do a humane and professional job against some serious odds. As we have also pointed out as we have published the nasty stuff going on at Chicago's Taylor Elementary School under the dictatorship of Principal William Truesdale (annual salary, $149,000 per year), most Chicago principals are not bullying assholes who go crazy trying to set up teachers for "insubordination" charges with the support of their Network Chiefs (Karen Saffold, annual salary $151,000 per year). As we have reported, our experience is that the majority of Chicago principals and teachers are trying to respond in a decent and professional way to the current confusion and hypocrisy coming from the CPS administration and the Illinois State Board of Education. Hence, when we received the following open letter on March 16, 2015, we immediately decided to publish it here. George N. Schmidt Editor Substance].
Principal Troy LaRaviere standing in front of James G. Blaine Elementary School in Chicago. Blaine's Local School Council has voted to Opt Out of the PARCC this year, and their principal has become one of the most vocal public critics of CPS polices on testing and so-called "accountability." Organized Confusion: PARCC Hypocrisy, Bullying, and Fear-Mongering in CPS
An Open Letter to Barbara Byrd-Bennett, CEO of Chicago Public Schools
Cc: Rahm Emanuel, Mayor
Ms. Byrd-Bennett,
In response to parent and teacher support for opting children out of the PARCC Test, you sent a message to all CPS principals. It states:
"Please be advised that ISBE does not recognize a parent�s right to opt a child out of required student assessments, as there is no law in Illinois allowing this. While a parent cannot �opt a child out,� there may be students who refuse to participate in required state assessments."
There are numerous faults and inconsistencies in your letter. I attempt to address a few of them here.
�Choice� Hypocrisy
It is pitifully ironic that you, Mr. Emanuel, and ISBE Chairman James Meeks � self-professed proponents of what you call �parental school choice� � would fight so vigorously to deny parents the choice of opting their children out of testing.
Posturing, Bullying and Wasting Learning Time
Your letter states that even if the parent states, in writing, not to test the child, school officials still must present each child with each one of the five sections of the PARCC tests and force the child to refuse each section separately. In April � when the second half of the PARCC is administered � you have directed us to repeat this process with up to 3 sessions. In total we have been directed to force students to verbally or physically refuse the PARCC on up to eight distinct occasions.
Your letter goes on to state:
"It is unfortunate that ISBE�s limited guidance on this matter has placed the burden of refusing the test on students. I believe this is unfair to our students, families, principals and staff. However, we are obligated to follow ISBE�s limited direction to avoid sanctions that would have a devastating impact on our district."
If you believe it is �unfortunate,� and �unfair� then why are CPS officials forcing children in some schools to refuse not only to the teacher, but to the principal and the network chief? If you believe it�s �unfair,� why was a network chief sent to Mollison School � my elementary alma mater � where the chief forced each student to refuse directly to her; in one case repeatedly forcing a fourth grade autistic child to articulate his desire to opt out despite the fact that he�d already made his desire clear when he himself submitted a signed note from his mother?
Then there�s what happened at Taylor school on the far southeast side, where a teacher reported an administrator, �got within a few inches of the face of one young man in the [opt-out] line, and asked him loudly, �DID SHE PUT A TICKET IN YOUR HAND?!!!�, then ordered the teacher to �PUT A TESTING TICKET IN EVERY STUDENT�S HAND AND PUT THEM IN FRONT OF A COMPUTER!�
Perhaps even more importantly, why are these appalling tactics being used solely against low-income minority children � the children our mayor said would �never amount to anything�; the children whose schools he shut down; the children whom he funnels to charter schools where they experience less academic growth than in the public schools they came from? Why have you added PARCC bullying to the long list of offenses CPS has committed against these children and their families?
Deception and Confusion Part 1: Repressive Framing of the Law
Your letter is deceptive in how it frames parental rights. The letter does not state that parents don�t have a right to opt their children out. It states that ISBE does not recognize a parent�s right to opt their children out. In other words, despite the fact that parents do have that right, ISBE has chosen not to acknowledge it.
There is a sentence on which the logic of everything in your letter rests. The sentence is as follows:
"Please be advised that ISBE does not recognize a parent�s right to opt a child out of required student assessments, as there is no law in Illinois allowing this."
The statement, �There is no law in Illinois allowing this� is particularly disturbing. There is no law in Illinois allowing us to teach with �smart boards,� pull our children from school for family vacations, or assign homework on Fridays. Yet people do all of these things with regularity without consequence. We are not a society that curtails its actions based on the absence of a law allowing us to do a particular thing. We curtail our behavior based on the presence of an explicit law or rule prohibiting us from engaging in a particular act.
The fact that ISBE and CPS expects this kind of ominous and unsettling totalitarian logic to hold water is insulting to the principles of liberty and a seemingly desperate and pathetic attempt to inject confusion into a matter which is utterly clear: In a situation in which students are distressingly over-tested, parents have the right to opt their students out of standardized testing.
Deception and Confusion Part 2: Funding
Third, you cite a letter from ISBE that threatens to withhold funding should CPS not test �100%� of students. These threats violate ISBE�s own precedents in terms of how it has dealt with opt-outs in past years, and would subject ISBE to a massive class-action lawsuit should it be foolish and vindictive enough to follow through on its threats to withhold money from bilingual students, students with disabilities, and students from low-income households simply because students and their parents chose not to take a test. This threat has no merit; yet you continue to spread ISBE�s false doomsday pronouncements in an effort to frighten parents, teachers, and principals into subjecting our students to the failed practice of over-testing them.
A couple months ago you stated it was not in our students� best interested to take the PARCC. If you sincerely believed this, you could have done what the New York City Department of Education advised its principals to do when parents opt their children out of similar state tests. They instructed their principals to �respect the parents� decision and let them know that the school will work to the best of their ability to provide the child with an alternate educational activity.�
Instead you changed your tune and began praising the PARCC, calling it the �truest measure of the Common Core� in your letter to principals. Your implausible flip-flop on the issue gives some measure of believability to those who felt CPS�s request to have only 10% of students take the PARCC was an insincere election season ruse.
Summary and Conclusion
CPS has exhibited intense hypocrisy in regard to parental choice. It has bullied children and their families, been deceptive in its repressive framing of the law in regard to opt out rights, and parroted dubious claims about losing funds in relationship to opting out.
As a result, I will be taking the following course of action and call on you to advise all CPS principals to do the same:
Our school will meet its responsibility to administer the PARCC to all students who want to take it. Nearly 80% of our students have already expressed their decision to refuse the PARCC by submitting letters from their parents opting them out of the test. When students handed that opt-out letter to their teachers, that act was an expression of their refusal to take the test. That is enough for me, and it should be enough for CPS and ISBE. No child under my watch, who has expressed his or her decision to refuse the PARCC, will be sat in front of any computer to take it, nor presented with any materials. We will not waste even more learning time by subjecting our students to ISBE�s deceptive fear-mongering and CPS�s hypocritical test-driven political theater.
Respectfully,
Troy LaRaviere
CPS Graduate
Former CPS Teacher
CPS Parent
CPS Principal
Email: TroyLaRaviere@gmail.com
Twitter: @TroyLaRaviere
Next Week: ISBE�s Version of Stand Your Ground � An Open Letter to James Meeks, Chairman of the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE)
By: Jean Schwab
opt out
Bravo- My thoughts exactly!