Sections:

Article

The hypocrisy of Arne Duncan's 'Rosa Parks Moment' shilling for 'Waiting for Superman'

Having often declared segregated corporate school reform as the "civil rights issue of this generation," Arne Duncan just placed himself on a whole new circle of Orwellian doublespeak hell by declaring last evening's extended commercial for the corporate charter crusade as a "Rosa Parks moment." The event was a Washington D.C. screening of the corporate propaganda film "Waiting for Superman" on September 15, 2010.

From the Hollywood Reporter:

Calling it a "Rosa Parks moment," U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan put a momentous stamp on the upcoming release of Davis Guggenheim's education-reform documentary "Waiting for Superman."

The occasion was the film's Wednesday night Washington premiere, > organized by distributor Paramount Vantage, with a screening at the Newseum followed by a Q&A with notables involved in the film. That it will have the impact on public policy Parks' actions ultimately had on the civil rights movement might be unlikely, but a good portion of Washington's political class attended the event to further investigate the subject matter. . . .

I can think of a couple of ways that this feature-length marketing tool for Eli Broad is not a Rosa Parks moment. First, the person taking the big risk of defying the racist policy that would put black people at the back of the bus was a black person — Rosa Parks.

Who is risking what in this present charade crusade? Well, some philanthro-capitalists are risking many millions of dollars, some would say, even though 33 cents on every dollar invested is given back in tax credits. The payoffs could be astronomical, too, if the charterites prevail and end up replacing public schools in urban areas. But Bill Gates or Eli Broad will never go to jail for their > efforts or have their livelihoods or lives put in jeopardy.

Another difference between Rosa Parks and the Walton Foundation (it's too absurd a juxtaposition to even be funny) is that Rosa Parks actually had the support of the civil rights community behind her. In the present instance that Arne thinks is a "Rosa Parks moment," the following organizations have offered withering criticism of Arne's Blueprint:

-- Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under Law

-- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)

-- NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

-- National Council for Educating Black Children > National Urban League

-- Rainbow PUSH Coalition

-- Schott Foundation for Public Education

In fact, they have offered their own plan for high quality, diverse, and equitable education for all children, a plan that does not involve CEOs, hedge funders, venture philanthropy, EMOs, CMOs, or the ZOO that the oligarchy has put schools in at this point in our history.

Rosa Parks also had the citizens behind her to demand that the laws be changed to make such an arrest impossible in the future. At this present historic tipping point, the citizens and the voters have made it clear in elections in New York and Washington, DC that that they are not on the side of change led by the banksters and casino capitalists who want to gamble the lives of school children on risky ventures that have little or no evidence and research to support them.

A Rosa Parks moment? I think not. Rosa Parks, at present, does not need a ride that badly.

Posted By Jim Horn to Schools Matter at 9/17/2010 10:06:00 PM. www.schoolsmatter



Comments:

Add your own comment (all fields are necessary)

Substance readers:

You must give your first name and last name under "Name" when you post a comment at substancenews.net. We are not operating a blog and do not allow anonymous or pseudonymous comments. Our readers deserve to know who is commenting, just as they deserve to know the source of our news reports and analysis.

Please respect this, and also provide us with an accurate e-mail address.

Thank you,

The Editors of Substance

Your Name

Your Email

What's your comment about?

Your Comment

Please answer this to prove you're not a robot:

3 + 5 =